发布会·中文精读

Tesla Battery Day

中文精读由 AI 基于原始视频与文稿改写,非官方翻译,可能存在偏差或错误;表述以原视频为准。说明

2020 年 9 月,特斯拉在弗里蒙特工厂的停车场办了一场发布会。观众不下车,坐在自己的车里看台上,鼓掌用按喇叭代替。马斯克站上台后说的第一句实话是:对着一片停车场讲话,很难判断现场反应,但这是当时唯一能办的形式。

这场发布会被叫作 Battery Day(电池日)。名字容易让人误会,以为是一次电芯参数的更新。实际上从头到尾它在回答一个问题:电池成本这条曲线,为什么变平了,怎么把它重新压下去。

先把两个数字放在一起看。

全球在用的汽车和卡车大约 20 亿辆,其中纯电动的比例不到 1%。全球电网侧储能,做完的比例不到 0.1%。

另一边,2020 年美国新增发电装机容量里,风电和光伏合计占了 75%。煤电的占比从 2010 年的 46% 掉到了 23%,十年砍掉一半。

电这一侧在快速变绿,车和储能这一侧几乎还没开始动。中间的瓶颈只有一个东西:电池的每千瓦时成本降得不够快。最近几年,这条曲线甚至有变平的趋势。

先讲清楚这家公司站在哪

马斯克开场没有直接讲电池,讲的是工厂。

上海超级工厂从一片空地到量产用了 15 个月。马斯克特意点出一件在中文语境里被讲过很多次、但在英文语境里很少被提起的事:特斯拉是唯一一家在中国拥有 100% 独资工厂的外国汽车制造商。他的说法是,这件事经常没被充分理解,它带来了巨大的回报。他预计上海工厂未来会爬升到年产 100 万辆以上。

Model Y 是特斯拉历史上最顺利的一次新车发布。这句话的分量要放在背景里看,因为马斯克接下来花了很多时间讲一件事:造车这一行,真正难的部分从来不在设计。

造一台让人兴奋的原型车,那不难。如果问特斯拉作为一家汽车公司真正的成就是什么,答案是这个:特斯拉是美国近一百年来,第一家做到规模量产、并且持续盈利的汽车公司。这件事一百年没发生过。这才是真正超难的部分。(马斯克)

现在特斯拉有四款车同时在量产,S、3、X、Y。马斯克顺便开了个玩笑,说 S3XY 大概是汽车史上最难凑的一个谐音梗。

其他几条业务数据:连续四个季度 GAAP 盈利;推出了全美成本最低的太阳能,1.49 美元一瓦,做法是砍掉销售和广告环节,压掉一堆不必要成本;Megapack 单机 3 兆瓦时;2019 年增长 50%,2020 年在疫情、山火、一堆生产问题里预计还能做到 30% 到 40% 的增长。他把 2020 年称为特斯拉历史上最难的一年。

增长靠的是什么?马斯克说得很直接:口碑。现有车主推荐给新车主,没有别的花招。他觉得这种增长方式很纯粹。

造原型车是最简单的那部分

演讲里有一段关于制造业的判断,值得单独拎出来。

马斯克说,制造业整体被低估了。设计"造机器的机器",难度远高于设计机器本身。做一个 Model 3 或者 Cybertruck 的样车是相当简单的事,设计生产它的工厂要难上 10 倍到 100 倍,如果这个工厂还要用全新的工艺,难度还要再往上翻。

他给的量化是:原型最多占整个难度的 10%,很可能只有 1%。

这解释了为什么市场上总有一批公司能拿出惊艳的概念车,然后卡死在量产那一步。它们把 90% 的精力放在了占难度 1% 的环节上。

特斯拉认定的三项核心能力是工程、制造、软件。软件被单列出来,理由是他把车看成一装有轮子的笔记本电脑,而且软件不只在车上,工厂里的软件同样是核心。工厂的软件能力,直接决定了产线的节拍。

特斯拉值多少钱:产量乘以自动驾驶

马斯克给了一个估值公式,很粗暴,也很有信息量:

特斯拉的价值 = 总产量 × 每辆车的自动驾驶价值。

这个公式把两件事拆开了。产量那一侧,靠的是规模经济和制造效率。自动驾驶那一侧,是一辆车出厂之后还能继续增值的部分。

他还讲了一段关于现金流的话,这段是给制造业从业者听的。逻辑是这样的:一辆车从被下单到交付,中间有一段时间。如果这段时间能压缩到应付账款的账期之内,公司增长得越快,手上的现金反而越多。反过来,如果超过账期,增长越快,现金越少,对重资产公司来说就是灾难。

所以工厂的地理位置有了一层新意义。每个大洲至少得有一座工厂,不然这个账算不平。柏林工厂、奥斯汀工厂的意义不只在于产能,还在于把零件到整车到客户这条链缩短。

奥斯汀这个选址,马斯克专门解释了一遍:哪怕德州工厂的成本和加州完全一样,放在那里也划算,因为它在美国大约三分之二的位置上。往中西部和东海岸送车更快、更便宜,经济性从根本上就变了。这一层经常被忽略。

还有一句他顺手说的话,可以当预言看:随着公司变大,事情通常会变慢,但特斯拉接下来会变快。

Autopilot 推倒重来:从一堆照片到四维视频

Autopilot 这一段是整场演讲里最诚实的技术复盘。

马斯克说他一直在开 Autopilot 的最前沿内测版本,所以能看到别人看不到的东西。两年前,团队卡在了一个"局部最优"里,指标在涨,但涨幅越来越小,怎么都到不了该去的地方。他的判断是必须重写整个软件栈,包括标注软件。

过去的做法是:8 个摄像头各自产生一堆单帧图片,由不同的人在不同的时间打标签。有些图片人眼根本判断不出标的是什么,标注错误率很高,某些情况下压根没法标。

新做法是在三维空间加时间轴上标注,也就是他说的 4D:三个维度加时间。所有摄像头同步,看图像随时间怎么变化,然后对整段视频打标签。神经网络和整车逻辑也跟着重做了一遍。

效果的具体体现是安全数据。美国平均每百万英里发生 2.1 起碰撞,开启 Autopilot 的状态下是 0.3 起。差了将近 7 倍。马斯克给的目标是把这个数字做到行业平均的 10 倍好,也就是一个数量级的差距,理由是这直接对应多少条命、多少次受伤。

他给出的时间点是:大概一个月后,推一个 FSD 的私人 beta。他的原话是"变化幅度是惊人的"、"显然会成功"。考虑到他历来对时间点偏乐观,这个 beta 更值得关注的是它验证了重写这条路走通了,而不是具体哪天上线。

气候那部分:一堵墙和一条变平的曲线

电池部分由 Drew Baglino 和马斯克交替讲。开场的第一张图是 CO2 浓度曲线,看起来像一堵墙。马斯克的措辞很少这么重:过去五年是有记录以来最热的五年,在这颗星球上跑一个气候实验,是疯了。

然后他给出好消息,而且给得很具体:

  • 2020 年美国新增发电装机里,风电加光伏占 75%。
  • 煤电占比十年从 46% 降到 23%。
  • 电站寿命大约 25 年,所以哪怕明天 100% 新建装机都是可再生的,电网完成切换仍要 25 年。

为什么还要造这么多电池?因为风电光伏是间歇的。风不吹、太阳下山,就得有东西接着。马斯克的估算量级是:把全球车队全部电动化,需要每年大约 10 太瓦时的电池产能;把全球能源结构整体转成可再生,需要每年 20 到 25 太瓦时,持续 15 到 25 年。

他特意强调了一句容易被误解的话:这不是一个钱的问题。钱是虚的,真正稀缺的是人力、机器、以及造机器的机器。给定一份投入,要让它产出尽可能多的电池。这句话解释了后面所有关于制造效率的讨论。

第二个目标更接地气:造出真正买得起的车。马斯克说这是他最困扰的事情之一,特斯拉到现在还没有一台真正便宜的车。而电池成本曲线最近几年在变平, affordability 的改善速度跟不上,所以才有了这场电池日。

更大的电芯,为什么反而功率更高

先插一个冷知识。18650 和 2170 这两个奇怪的数字,前两位是直径,后两位是长度,单位毫米。马斯克说他一直没搞明白为什么后面要多加一个零,既然没人能解释,那就删掉。所以他要求以后的型号命名不再带那个没有意义的零。

接下来说正事。电芯做大,常识判断是功率会下降,因为电子要跑的路更长。特斯拉的解法是把极耳去掉。

极耳是电芯内部把电流引到外壳的那一小片金属。有极耳的电池,电子要从卷绕的每一层先跑到极耳,再汇出去,路径长、内阻大、发热多。取消极耳,让整个外壳直接参与导电,结果是大电芯内部的电子路径比小电芯还短,功率重量比反而更好。

这件事的难度在于,把电芯做大,谁都会。做没有极耳的大电芯,还要能可靠地焊到顶盖上,之前没人做成过。马斯克的原话是:

任何傻瓜都能把电芯做大。问题是,我们难道不是任何傻瓜吗?(马斯克)

台下笑了。他接着说,对真正懂电芯的人来说,无极耳是巨大的突破。工程师 Drew Baglino 补了一句更实在的评价:优雅和简单,做起来依然很难,我们试了很多次。

无极耳还有一个被低估的好处,在制造端。有极耳的卷绕电芯在生产线上必须不断停下来,在极耳的位置做焊接,一停一启动,节拍就被拖慢。有时候极耳位置没对准,还会损失一点活性面积。从生产角度看,极耳是个彻头彻尾的麻烦。去掉之后,产线可以做连续运动。

这里有个容易看错的地方需要说明。发布会上给出的一堆百分比,比如某个环节带来 16% 的提升,指的是这一项创新单独贡献的量。把所有单项贡献加起来,才是最终的能量密度和成本改善总量。不能拿单项数字去乘以总盘子。

干法电极:马斯克自己说"这事还没有完全拿下"

整场演讲里最值得学的一段,是马斯克对干法电极(dry coating electrode)的坦诚。

这项技术来自一年多前收购的 Maxwell。马斯克对收购来的技术评价很克制:那更像是概念验证。收购之后,干法电极的设备已经改了四版,还有大量工作要做。他明确说,不能讲这件事已经稳了。

他给了一个从实验室到量产的通用判断:从台面到实验室、到中试、到量产,每一级都会撞上新的重大问题。你在台面上做通了,不等于明天能造一百万份。

紧接着他又补了一刀,把话说得更实:现在在中试线上,干法电极接近能跑通,可以说它确实在工作,但良率不好。这条路是清楚的,中间的工作量是巨大的。

Baglino 补充了一个时间尺度:等到大规模量产时,这台设备大概会迭代到第六版或者第七版,每三到四个月出一个新版本。

这种表述方式在科技发布会上很少见。"接近工作,但良率不高"这七个字,比任何"颠覆性突破"都更有信息量。它同时告诉了你技术的成熟度和风险所在。

把工厂当成火箭方程来算

马斯克讲工厂的方式,和他讲火箭是同一套语言。

他说工厂的物理本质很像火箭方程:一个是速度,一个是质量比。换成工厂的语言就是:物料在厂里流动的速度有多快,以及厂区体积里有多大比例在真正做有用的功。

然后他补了一句关键定义:传送不算有用功。一条产线如果大部分空间和时间都花在搬运上,那这个工厂的效率就是低的。马斯克用的比喻是"一路绿灯",没有红绿灯和堵车。

这套算法能解释特斯拉为什么执着于把工序合并、把零件数量往下砍、把供应商的环节往厂内收。每合并一步,就少一段传送,少一段传送,就多一段有效功。

他给的目标很直白:特斯拉要做地球上制造能力最强的公司。理由是,长远看,所有车厂最终都会有长续航电动车,所有公司最终都会有自动驾驶,但不会所有公司都擅长制造。

中试工厂(pilot plant)的规划是 10 吉瓦时年产能,达产大约要一年。他特意提醒,设计产能和实际达产之间永远有一段时间差。而真正的量产工厂,单个规模在 200 吉瓦时左右,甚至更多。

需要说清楚的是,特斯拉自建产能不是要替代供应商。自产的 100 吉瓦时是增量,松下、LG、宁德时代的采购会继续。长期目标是做到每年 3000 吉瓦时,也就是 3 太瓦时。他说 2030 年前有很高信心,运气好的话能提前。

化学:铁、镍锰、高镍,三层打法

电池化学部分,特斯拉给的方案是分层,而不是找一个万能配方。

第一层是铁。磷酸铁锂,中续航乘用车和储能。马斯克讲了一个容易算错的点:在正极材料层面比较,镍的能量密度看起来是铁的两倍;但把整个电池包算进去,镍只比铁好 50% 到 60%。铁比看上去要能打。更关键的是资源量,镍的全球年产量有天花板,铁没有,铁多到离谱。所以铁基电池在原材料层面可以放量,镍基不行。

第二层是镍锰。做法是把正极做成三分之二镍、三分之一锰。这个配比的好处是,用同样多的镍,能做出多 50% 的电芯体积。对镍供应受限的年份来说,这是直接的解法。

第三层是高镍。给 Cybertruck 和 Semi 这类需要长续航的产品。Semi 这种车,能量密度不够就完全跑不起来。

马斯克还讲了他为镍做的事:亲自给全球最大的几家矿业公司的 CEO 打电话,请他们多产镍。他说这话的时候语气挺无奈。

镍的供应链被他形容成一场荒诞剧。一个镍原子从矿里出来到变成电池级材料,要在全球绕三圈,中间反复地挖沟、填沟、再挖沟。这些流程是历史遗留堆出来的,一环扣一环,没有人从第一性原理重新算过一遍。特斯拉做的就是把整条价值链摊开,问一句:从矿到成品,最短的路径是什么。

结论是正极生产要放进特斯拉自己的电池厂里。矿石运进去,电池出来,中间的来回运输全部消掉。

硅和锂:地球上最不缺的两样东西

负极方向是硅。硅的问题大家都知道,充放电时体积膨胀,材料会碎。马斯克的形容很形象:硅会像饼干一样碎掉,然后变得黏糊糊的。

解法是便宜的弹性离子导电聚合物涂层,加上高弹性粘结剂,让硅颗粒在膨胀收缩时还能保持连接。成本上 silicon 大概是一美元每千瓦时这个量级,比现在电池里用的材料便宜非常多,而且可以多用很多。用量上去了,能量密度和成本同时受益。

锂这一段,马斯克讲得最兴奋。

他先说结论:地球上的锂多到离谱,它不是石油。美国境内已探明的锂,足够把全美大约 3 亿辆车全部换成电动。

过去没人往这个方向使劲,因为锂到处都有,不缺。真正的问题是怎么用最聪明、最环保的方式把锂从矿石里提出来。

特斯拉的答案是从第一性原理重算了一遍流程,然后发现可以用食盐,也就是氯化钠,来提取锂。据他所知,之前没人这么干过。所有用到的元素都可以循环使用。

配套的是内华达州一块超过一万英亩的锂黏土矿开采权。开采方式是:挖一块土出来,把锂取走,再把土填回去。马斯克说这块地看起来会和之前差不多,不会变成一个丑陋的大坑。

回收也被放进了规划。过去电池回收由第三方做,第三方要处理各种形态的电池。特斯拉自己回收的好处是,它回收的电池和自己正在生产的是同一种。流程可以针对性优化。长期看,当车队规模进入稳态,新电池的原料会大量来自旧电池。

让电池包变成机翼

整车架构这一段,是整场发布会工程含量最高的部分。

第一个动作是一体压铸。特斯拉定制了有史以来最大的压铸机,就装在弗里蒙特工厂马路对面,用高压压铸铝合金一次成型整个后车身。下一步是前车身也这么干。

难点在材料。大尺寸铸件如果做热处理,会翘,马斯克的说法是变成薯片那样。所以需要一种不需要热处理、不需要涂层、还能保持高强度的可铸铝合金。市面上没有,特斯拉的材料团队自己配了一种。

第二个动作更关键:让电池包成为结构件。

马斯克用航空史做类比。早期飞机把油箱当货物挂在机身里,固定很麻烦,比普通货物还难处理。后来有人问了一句:如果直接把机翼做成油箱的形状呢?现代飞机的机翼就是一个机翼形状的油箱,它同时承担结构和储能两个功能,不再是货物。

电池包走的是同一条路。它第一次有了双重身份:储能装置,也是车身结构。

实现方式是填充物的变化。现在的电池包里灌的是阻燃填充物;新的方案里,填充物同时是结构胶和阻燃剂。它把电芯粘在上下两块板之间,让上下板之间能传递剪切力。

这个结构有个现成的参照:F1 赛车和赛艇用的碳纤维面板加铝蜂窝夹层,两块面板中间夹芯材,刚度高得离谱。所有追求极致速度的东西都是这么做的。

马斯克说特斯拉这个方案比飞机还狠一层。飞机的油箱里是液体,传递不了剪切力;电池是固体,可以直接用钢壳把上下板的剪切力连起来。结果就是结构刚度比普通车还高,高到如果做成一台没有上半身的敞篷车,它依然比普通轿车更刚。

顺带还有一个操控上的好处:极惯性矩。花样滑冰运动员收手臂会转得更快,质量越靠近中心,转动惯量越小。把电池铺在底盘中间,车的转向响应会更好。马斯克说这种好,你说不清为什么,就是觉得更灵活。

最后的数字

把所有改进叠加,特斯拉给出的结论是:每吉瓦时的投资额下降 69%。

马斯克在这里玩了个梗,说"0.420%,当然"。台下懂的人笑了。

另外一个数字是,在电芯制造环节,每吉瓦时的投资相比现有最好的水平改善 75%,也就是四倍。

时间表也很实在:一年到一年半开始看到收益,完全兑现大约需要三年。他说如果能立刻做到,现在就做了。

长期产能目标是每年 2000 万辆。参照系是全球 20 亿辆的保有量,也就是替代 1%。这个数字放在发布会上说,是有点野心的,但它给出了一个可以持续几十年的增长空间。

最后放了个彩蛋:Plaid 版本在拉古纳塞卡(Laguna Seca)跑出了 1 分 30 秒,马斯克说还能再快 3 秒以上,目标是有史以来所有量产车里的最快圈速,两门四门一起算。

问答里的干货

后半段的问答比演讲部分更有料,几个回答值得记下来。

关于 Cybertruck。订单超过 50 万,大概 60 万,已经不数了。他估计年销量在 25 到 30 万辆,可能更多。这款车是按美国规格设计的,理由很硬:如果要同时满足全球所有市场的法规超集,Cybertruck 就造不出来。会另做一个更小的国际版,他形容为"更紧凑的金刚狼"。另外他吐槽了德州的直销法规:能在德州租车,但不能在德州卖车,成交要点击一个架在加州的服务器。

关于内燃机的未来。他说长期不会再有内燃机行业,也许还剩一点,像现在还有人做蒸汽机,但那是收藏品。

关于 V2G(车网互动)。这个回答很反直觉。经常有人问,特斯拉为什么不支持车辆向电网反向供电。马斯克的回答有三层:技术上要防止电流倒灌电网,得配一整套断电切换系统;用户其实想要的是早上车是满电的,如果夜里车把电放给了房子,早上就得在开车和用家里电之间二选一;最早那批 Roadster 就带 V2G 能力,没人用过。

他给的方案是分开:Powerwall 管房子,车管出行,再加一套光伏,你就成了自己的电力公司,车还能用光伏充电。

关于便宜的车。马斯克区分了两个概念:可负担性和产品吸引力是两回事。很多人想买特斯拉,就是钱不够。把车做得再吸引人,买不起还是买不起。这个区分听着简单,但在产品讨论里经常被混淆。他给的时间表是三年左右推出 2.5 万美元级别的车,算上总拥有成本,大概和同价位燃油车打平甚至略好。

关于利润率。过去四个季度平均大约 1%。他说得很直白:估值让外界以为特斯拉在印钱,其实没有。所谓利润,就是收入得大于支出,否则公司就死了。所以定价会尽量贴近成本,但不会亏本卖。

关于招人。他说近几年工程院校毕业生的去向调查里,前两名一直是特斯拉和 SpaceX,有时候特斯拉第一,有时候 SpaceX 第一。理由不是薪水,是这些人相信自己的努力真的有用。

关于其他公司。有人问,这么大的事,谁来跟特斯拉一起干。马斯克的回答带着疲惫:中国有一批公司在电动车和储能上做得很好,只是美国还看不到多少;特斯拉把专利免费开放了,也一直在劝其他厂商转型,

我们讲这些话讲到嘴都干了。他们不相信。我们还能做什么呢?(马斯克)

他还纠正了一个流行的说法。石油和天然气行业常用一套话术:你要环保,就得接受失业、接受生活水平下降、接受经济牺牲。马斯克和 Baglino 的回答是,这是伪二选一。可持续能源的最终成本比化石能源更低,不是更高。接受这个前提之后,转型就从道德问题变成了经济问题,阻力会小很多。

关于他自己为什么做电动车,他给了一段很少讲的个人史:高中时他担心的是石油耗尽导致经济崩溃,那会儿还没人跟他讲气候。气候风险的严重性,是他后来才意识到的。他习惯把这件事当科学问题处理,不断质疑假设,给假设分配概率。

至于飞机,他说已经有小批量电池能做到 400 瓦时每公斤,这个数字够中程支线飞机用。特斯拉的电池长期也会往这个区间走。唯一的例外是火箭,因为不可能有电动火箭。星舰有 80% 是液氧,他们已经在拉电线用风电制液氧,能做的就这些。

这次发布会真正说了什么

把两个小时的内容压缩,核心就三层。

第一层是制造。真正难的不是技术本身,是把技术变成能以百万级规模稳定生产的东西。原型占 1% 的难度,工厂占 99%。无极耳、干法电极、一体压铸、结构化电池包,每一项都在减少工序、减少搬运、减少零件数。它们的共同点是让工厂的"有用功占比"变高。

第二层是成本结构。每吉瓦时投资降 69%,长期的产能目标 3 太瓦时,落到产品上就是一台 2.5 万美元的车。所有电池化学的选择,铁、镍锰、高镍的分层,硅负极,用食盐提锂,都在往同一个方向推。

第三层是时间。马斯克给的时间表一向乐观,但这次他自己反复强调"一年到一年半开始见效,三年完全兑现",并且主动承认干法电极良率还不够好。这种自我限速的表述,比数字本身更可信。

顺带说一句,他把特斯拉的成功指标定义成了一句可以量化的东西:我们让可持续能源提前了多少年到来。不是市值,不是销量,不是利润率。这句话对整个公司的技术路线选择有约束力,因为它逼着每个决策都去回答"这能让转型快多少"。

  • 如果你在做硬件或深科技创业,把"原型做出来"当作项目的 1%,而不是 90%。剩下的时间、钱和人,要按制造良率爬坡的节奏来规划。
  • 遇到技术曲线变平,先怀疑整个行业的默认做法,不要先怀疑自己的执行。镍的供应链绕地球三圈没人觉得奇怪,这就是信号。
  • 把供应链当现金流问题看,不只是采购问题。订单到交付的时间能压进应付账款周期,增长就自动变成现金,压不进去,增长就是失血。
  • 评估一项技术突破,看它是不是同时改善了成本、能量密度、功率和制造节拍。只在单点改善的方案,通常会被系统里其他环节抵消掉。
  • 跟人介绍一项还没成熟的技术,用"接近能跑通,但良率不好"这种表述。它比"颠覆性突破"有用得多,因为它同时传递了方向和风险。
  • 读公司财报别只看营收和估值。特斯拉四个季度平均利润率大概 1%,这个数字才解释了它为什么必须把每吉瓦时投资往下压 69%。
  • 如果你在招人,最有说服力的不是薪酬包,是让对方相信这件事对别人真的有用。工程院校毕业生的去向调查已经把这个结论摆在那儿好几年了。
语音识别自动转录,可能有识别错误,人名与数字请以视频为准。已按语句合并成段落,并去掉 um、uh 等口头填充词。 文稿来源:Rev.com (transcription humaine)。

1:06:45Everyone. Well, I mean, this is definitely a new approach. We've got the Tesla drive in movie theater, basically. It's good to see everyone. It's a little hard to read the room with everyone being in cars, but it's the only way we can do it. So hopefully it's cool. And hopefully you can hear me. Can you guys hear me?

1:07:58I think starting from in terms of our ability to create a... In terms of our ability to create a factory, huge kudos to the Tesla Shanghai team for being able to go from literally a dirt pile to volume production in 15 months. It's like, damn. Yeah. And I think something that's really quite noteworthy here is Tesla's the only foreign manufacturer to have a hundred percent owned factory in China. So this is often not well understood or not appreciated, but to have the only hundred percent owned foreign factory in China is a really big deal, and it's paying huge dividends here. So we really wouldn't have the results that we have had this year without the great efforts of the Tesla China team, so I'm super appreciative of that, and we'll see the Shanghai factory continue to scale quite a bit from where it is right now. I think we really could expect that to be, over time, a factory that produces over a million vehicles a year.

1:09:16Yeah, it's cool. So let's see. So we also reached in the past year of volume production of the Model Y, and this was the smoothest launch that we've ever had, so I think we're definitely getting better at a new vehicle launches and building factories and scaling production. As you've heard me say before, the hardest thing is scaling production, especially of a new technology. It's insanely difficult. Making a prototype is relatively easy, and if I think, like, what is the real achievement of Tesla in sort of car company terms, it's like it wasn't making sort of exciting prototypes. It was that Tesla was really the first company in about a century in the U.S., the first U.S.

1:09:16company in the U.S. to reach volume production and be sustainably profitable. The crazy thing is this has really not happened in a hundred years. That's the actual super hard part, and we now have four vehicles in volume production, S3XY. Also, the toughest joke I think maybe ever. It was a very difficult joke to make.

1:10:38So we also introduced the lowest cost solar in the U.S. It's only a dollar 49 a watt, and we really just simplified the whole value chain, so reduced sales and advertising, got rid of a bunch of unnecessary costs, and really are just relying upon the fact that it's just the lowest cost, most efficient solar in the U.S., providing both a retrofit and the solar glass roof, which I think is a really great product. A hard product to make work, but it will be a major pipeline in the future.

1:11:13And we also got four consecutive quarters of gap profitability, which was very difficult. Yeah. And certainly a testament to the hard work of people at Tesla. I mean, to do this in extremely difficult times against a wide range of adverse circumstances was insanely hard, but we got it done, and I think the future is looking I think, very promising from a sort of an annual profitability standpoint.

1:11:13So in order to sort of do well financially, you really need economies of scale, and you need ideally the best technology, and I think we've had the best technology for a while, but now we are also achieving economies of scale, and we're also rapidly improving autonomy, which is a massive value add to each car. So, I think the value of Tesla is going to be like total, just on the vehicle side, total vehicles produced times the value of autonomy. That's a way to think about the future value of Tesla.

1:12:35We also have consistent free cashflow generation. This is really important for growth, and a key element here is tightening up the time from when a car is ordered to when it is built and delivered. So for a company that is growing rapidly, it's extremely important to tighten the supply chain and to have, from when parts arrive, put it into a car very quickly and deliver the car very quickly to the customer. And if you can do that inside soft of your payables timeline, then the faster you grow, the more cash you have. Or conversely, if you're unable to do it within your payables timeline, the faster you grow, the less money you will have, which is obviously bad for capital intensive situation. So just tightening up and having the parts move very quickly to the factory, put it in a car, get it to a customer makes a massive difference to cashflow generation.

1:13:34I mean, that's why it's extremely important to have a factory in each continent, because if you don't at least have a factory in the continent, it isn't impossible to achieve this. So having a factory in China, that's able to serve China, and then soon many other countries in the region will be key to us tightening that total sort of chain of cashflow, and essentially the faster we grow, the more cash. This is really important. That's also why it's important to have Giga Berlin complete, because then we'll have a factory in China, a factory in the U.S. and soon a second factory in the U.S. in Austin, and a factory in Europe.

1:14:18I mean, even if for Giga Texas in Austin, even if we had exactly the same cost as in California, it would still be advantageous to do it there because it's roughly two-thirds of the way across the U.S., so in terms of delivering cars to the central U.S. and to the East Coast, it's just faster, it costs less, and it fundamentally improves our economics. So I think this is also maybe something that's not fully appreciated of just how important it is to have a factory at least on the continent or reasonably close to where the end customers is, so you can tighten that whole chain.

1:14:56Industry performance. While the rest of industry is, has gone down, Tesla has gone up, I think this speaks to... Thanks. And so I'd like to thank all the customers for taking a chance on Tesla and buying our product and really hope you're enjoying it. This is really, our sales, as [inaudible 01:15:21] was saying, it really grew by word of mouth, so this is really, I think it's very pure in the sense that it's growing on the basis of existing owners recommending it to others to new customers. This is, really, I think, a good way to grow.

1:15:40So, and then in 2019 we had 50% growth, and I think we'll do really pretty well in 2020. Probably somewhere between 30-40% growth, despite a lot of very difficult circumstances. I mean, there's so many. Pandemic, the wildfires. It's a whole bunch of difficult production issues, but thanks to the hard work of the Tesla team and a lot of innovative approaches to overcoming issues, we're able to still see significant growth in one of the most difficult. In fact, I'd say probably the most difficult year of Tesla's existence.

1:16:25We also published our extended impact report. At Tesla, we try very hard to do the right thing. If what I think does not happen, it's just because we maybe made a mistake or weren't aware of it, but we always try to do the right thing to the best of our ability, and then we published the extended impact report to show just a self-examination of, okay, what are we doing, right? What are we doing wrong? What can we do better in the future? We're definitely trying to accomplish the most good, and so if we occasionally make a mistake, we work quickly to fix it and do the right thing. So it's worth looking at the average life cycle of emissions in the U.S.

1:16:25and just how much better a Tesla is or electric car than any kind of gasoline car, and what we'll talk about in the Battery Day is also just how much the grids around the world, and actually especially in the U.S., are greening. It's actually much faster than I think people realize, the U.S. is moving towards sustainable energy. And so as we move more and more to sustainable energy, then effectively you end up building the solar factories and the car factories themselves with solar or with sustainable energy. Over time, you will even mine with sustainable energy, and eventually it will get to an effective emissions of zero, so that's where things will end up.

1:18:41Our factories are also becoming safer, and if you look at the sort of accidents per vehicle, total vehicle made it's dramatically better than in the past, and it's already better than industry average, and we're confident we can get it to the best in the auto industry. Autopilot functionality continues to improve, and you can see it in the safety report that we publish every quarter. It's just getting better and better. The U.S. average for collisions is at roughly 2.1 per million miles, and with autopilot engaged, it's 0.3. I mean, this is a profound difference, really massive, and this will get even better.

1:18:41So we're confident that over time we can get the probability of an accident, especially the probability of injury, to 10 times better than the industry average, like an order of magnitude better. So that's just a lot of lives saved and a lot of injuries avoided, so that's a huge priority for us.

1:19:50Yeah, the autopilot front, I think it's hard for people to judge the progress of autopilot. I'm driving... As a matter of course, I've always done this. I drive the bleeding edge alpha build of autopilot, and so I sort of have insight into what is going on. Previously about a couple of years ago, we were kind of stuck in a local maximum, so we're improving, but the improvements kind of started tailing off and just not getting where they needed to be. I call this sort of getting trapped in a local maximum, and so we had to do a fundamental rewrite of the entire autopilot software stack and all of the labeling software as well.

1:20:40So we are now labeling in 3D video, so this is hugely different from the previously where we were labeling essentially a bunch of single images from the eight cameras, and they would be labeled at different times by different people, and some of the labels, you literally can't tell what it is you're labeling. So it basically made it sort of in some cases impossible to label, and the labels had a lot of errors. Now with our new labeling tools, we label it in video, so we actually label entire video segments in the system, so you get basically a surround video thing to label with the surround video and with time. So it's now taking all cameras simultaneously and looking at how the image has changed over time and labeling that, and then the sophistication of the neural nets in the car and the overall logic in the car has improved dramatically.

1:21:44I think we'll hopefully release a private beta of autopilot, of the full self-driving version of autopilot in, I think, a month or so, and then people will really understand just the magnitude of the change. It's profound. So, yeah. Anyway, so you'll see it. It's just like a hell of a step change, but because we had to rewrite everything, labeling software, just the entire code base, it took us quite a while. The sort of new... I call it like 4D in the sense that it's three dimensions plus time. It's just taken us a while to rewrite everything, and so you'll see what it's like. It's amazing. Yeah. It's just clearly going to work.

1:22:42At Tesla, the core competencies, we've got engineering, obviously, but also manufacturing. I think manufacturing is underappreciated in general, and the difficulty of designing the machine that makes the machine is vastly harder than the machine itself. So the designing, like making a Model 3 or Model Y or Cybertruck truck prototype is really quite trivial compared to designing the factory that makes it, especially if it's new technology, and you want to use new manufacturing methods. It's just at least 10 to 100 times harder to do the factory than the prototype, and that's why you see a lot of companies out there or startups they'll bring out a prototype, but they just can't get it over the hump for who manufacturing, because manufacturing of new technology especially is the hardest thing by fa. Basically, the prototype is at best 10% of the difficulty and probably closer to 1%.

1:23:50And then software. Tesla is both a hardware and a software company, so a huge percentage of our engineers are actually software engineers, and you can think of our car as kind of like a laptop on wheels, so software is incredibly important. Actually, not just in the car, but also in the factory. So the factory software is extremely important. Just software in general. I mean, these are fundamental. These are the three critical areas that are needed to make for an awesome company. So, yeah.

1:24:29So we have... Now we'll soon have three new factories incremental on... Well, we have one already. On three different continents. Shanghai, we're expanding the Shanghai with the second phase. Berlin is making rapid progress, and Texas is making even faster progress. So, yeah. With each factory, what we're trying to do is also improve the manufacturing technology, so in some cases like the Model Y made in Berlin might look the same, but it actually is made in a much more efficient way. Yeah, we'll talk about that later in the battery presentation.

1:25:15Yeah, we launched Megapack. It's three megawatt hours all in one energy storage solution, so it's been great overall. Yeah. All right. And I think that's basically it, right? All right, thank you. All right. Well, thanks, everyone, for coming, and we'll be back in a little bit to go through the battery stuff, and there's a little bit more. In addition to the battery stuff, we've got a few extras as well. So I think you'll really like what we have to say on batteries.

1:25:53The battery stuff we're going to talk about is truly revolutionary and essential to Tesla's goal. The fundamental good of Tesla, it's like, if you look back in history and say, "What good did Tesla do?" The good will by how many years did we accelerate sustainable energy? That's the true metric of success. It matters if sustainable energy happens faster or slower, and so that's really how I think about Tesla and how we should assess our progress. By how many years did we accelerate sustainable energy? And what we're going to talk about with batteries and a few other things will really explain how we're going to make a step change improvement in the acceleration of sustainable energy.

1:25:53Thank you. [inaudible 00:18:44]. Speaker 1: Hi, folks. That was great. We're going to take a short break before we begin the Battery Day event, so stay tuned. If you're local and here in the audience today, you can feel free to get out of the cars and stretch your legs, but try to stay near the cars, because we're going to begin properly in a little bit. See you soon. (silence).

1:27:06[inaudible 01:40:28]. Great. Should you start? Great. So let's see. You've got the clicker? Okay. Let's... Yeah. I'll take it at first, perhaps.

1:41:23So the past five years were the hottest on record. We have what looks like a wall for CO2 PPM. It's obviously... This time is not like the past. It's really important that we take action. Running this climate experiment is insane, so...

1:42:03There is a lot of good news though. A lot of people may not be aware that that wind and solar comprise 75% of new electricity capacity in the US this year. So this is really major. So the grid is going sustainable very quickly. Now, it's also worth noting that the length of time that power plants lasts is on the order of 25 years. So even if a hundred percent of energy generation was sustainable, it will still take 25 years to convert the grid. And it's also worth noting that in the past 10 years, power production from coal has dropped in half. So it went from 46% of electricity in 2010 to 23% in 2020. So this is a massive improvement. So good things are happening on a lot of levels.

1:44:38Yeah, you basically need on the order of roughly 10 terawatt hours a year of battery production to transition the global fleet of vehicles to electric.

1:45:00Yeah. So it's a lot of batteries, basically. Yeah. And this number I think might grow even more. As the world economy matures, and as countries with high populations industrialize, we could see this number be even more. But let's say it's like roughly 20 to 25 terawatt hours per year sustained for 15 to 25 years to transition the world to renewable.

1:46:32Yeah, and I think we should view this as more than just a question of money. Money is sort of an ethereal thing, but it's really the amount of effort. You have a certain amount of effort in terms of people and machines, and depending on how efficient that effort is, for a given amount of effort, you want the most amount of batteries. So it's not just the question of well, if we have $2 trillion, tomorrow you could make this. It's not that easy. You actually need to organize a massive number of people, build a lot of machines, build the machines that make the machines. And so it's incredibly important to have that effort yield the most number of batteries.

1:47:16So, and then goal two, obviously we need to make more affordable cars. I think one of the things that troubles me the most is that we don't yet have a truly affordable car, and that is something that we will make in the future. But in order to do that, we've got to get the cost of batteries down. We've got to make, and we've got to be better at manufacturing. And we need to do something about this curve. The curve of the cost per kilowatt hour of batteries is not improving fast enough. So we've given this a lot of thought over many years to say, okay, how can we radically improve the cost per kilowatt hour curve? It's been somewhat flattening out actually in recent years.

1:48:10Yeah, exactly. So yeah. And EV market share is growing, but EVs still aren't accessible to all. And you can see, as you Drew were saying, it's like starting to flatten out a little bit because the rate of improvement of the affordability of cars is just not fast enough. So that's why we've got Battery Day.

1:48:45Yeah. It's weird, the slides don't show up quite right here. What shows up on the screen is not quite what shows up there.

1:49:45Yeah. I mean, we basically thought through every element of the battery, or almost every element. There are a few more elements that we won't get to today, but we will get to in the future.

1:51:20Actually, slight note on why is the one called 18650, although not on the slide, versus the 2170, is that the first two digits refer to the diameter, and the second two digits refer to the length. So that helps explain what's up with these weird numbers. But nobody could explain to me why there was an extra zero. So I, so I said, "Okay, well, we're deleting the zero that nobody can explain in future form factors." So that's why it's technically, it's like the 18650 bizarrely, but going forward it's the 2170, because we just got rid of the extra zero because it's pointless.

1:52:37Any fool, any fool could make a bigger form factor. Are we not any fool?

1:53:46Yeah. This is important to appreciate. Basically the distance that that electron has to travel, it's just much less. So you actually have a shorter path length in a large tabless cell than you have in the smaller cell with tabs. This is a big deal. So even though the cell is bigger, it actually has more power. The power to weight ratio is actually better than the smaller cell with tabs. This is, again, this is quite hard to do it. Nobody's done it before and it really took a tremendous amount of effort within Tesla engineering to figure out how do we make a frigging tabless cell and have it actually work and then connect that to the top cap. There's a whole bunch of things that we're keeping a little secret sauce here that we're not telling everything, but- Drew Baglino: Sometimes what's elegant and simple is still hard. And it took us a lot of trials, but we're happy where we ended up.

1:54:46Yeah. I mean, everything is simple in recollection, after you... it's hard until it's discovered and then it's simple. So anyway, there's a lot of really cool things going on that enable tabless. And it was really due to a really great engineering team. Drew and the rest of the team had done amazing work in achieving this tabless construction. I think it may sort of sound a bit silly to some people, but for people that really know cells, this is a massive breakthrough.

1:55:28Yeah. Just to elaborate on that a bit, it's like when the cell is going through the system, it has to keep stopping where all the tabs are. So you can't do a continuous motion production if you have tabs. You have to keep stopping and then there's a rate at which you can start and stop and accelerate again and it really slows down the rate of production. And then sometimes you get the tabs wrong and you also lose a little bit of active area. It's really a huge pain in the ass to have tabs from a production standpoint.

1:56:23Yeah. So these... Yeah. It's pretty great. And just to clarify, when we see these plus 16% or whatever the percentage rate increase is, these are the amounts due just to that particular innovation. So we'll list a whole bunch of innovations and then when you add them up, you get a total improvement in energy density and cost. But these numbers are what refer to just this thing.

1:57:08Yeah. So. Yeah. It's a video of some of what's going on in the plant. Now. I mean, to be clear, it will take about a year to reach the 10 gigawatt hour capacity. So this is important to appreciate. When you build a factory, there's a certain capacity that you design to, and then it takes some period of time to actually achieve that capacity. So I would say it's probably about a year before we get to the 10 gigawatt hour annualized rate with the pilot plant. And this is just a pilot plant. The actual production plants will be more on the order of maybe 200 gigawatt hours, maybe more over time.

2:01:25I mean, it's hard actually, just to be clear. If this was easy, everyone would do it. It's not like dry coating electrode is actually easy. It's actually very hard to do what appears to be a simple thing. And it's worth noting, we did acquire Maxwell a little over a year ago, I guess, and certainly a good company and everything, but the dry coating they had was like, it's like sort of, I would call proof of concept. Since the acquisition. We've actually ramped the machine that does dry coating four times. So revision full post acquisition of the machine, and there's still a lot of work to do. So I would not say this is completely in the bag. It's still a lot of work to do.

2:01:25And as you grow, as you scale, go from benchtop to lab to pilot to volume production, there are actually major issues that you encounter at every level. It's not like you make something work on your bench and bingo, now you can make a bazillion of it.

2:02:48Yeah. I mean, to be clear, I would like to not say that right now, it just totally working. It's close to working, but it's not, even now at the pilot plant level, it is close to working. It's fair to say probably it does work, but with not a good, not a high yield.

2:03:29There's a clear path to success, but a ton of work between here and there. But this is a really profound improvement. Again, for people that know battery manufacturing, this is gigantic. We'll probably be on machine revision six or seven by the time we do large scale production. The rate at which the machines are being improved is extremely rapid. Literally every three or four months, there's a new rev.

2:04:24Exactly, no stop lights and traffic lights sort of thing. Yeah. So you can sort of think about the sort of the fundamental physics of a factory or something. I think it's actually quite a lot like the rocket equation where you've got basically the rocket equation you've got your exhaust velocity and then the log of [end 02:05:24] masses. So it's basically saying how fast are things going and what percentage of the factory volume is doing useful work? And conveyance does not count as useful work.

2:07:03Yeah. I mean, basically Tesla is aiming to be the best at manufacturing of any company on Earth. This is the thing that's actually most important in the long run I think, just from a company standpoint and from basically achieving sustainability as fast as possible. But I think also for long-term competitiveness, eventually every car company will have long range electric cars. Eventually every company will have autonomy, I think, but not every company will be a great at manufacturing. Tesla will be absolutely head and shoulders above anyone else in manufacturing, that is our goal.

2:08:43Sure. So essentially what this translates to based on what we know today is about a 75% reduction in the investment per kilowatt hour. Or gigawatt hour. It's just basically four times better than the current state of the art to the best of our knowledge. And I think there's probably room to improve even beyond that.

2:10:02Yeah. So this is just talking about Tesla internal cell production. As I tweeted out earlier, we will continue to use our cell suppliers, Panasonic and LG and CATL. And so this is a hundred gigawatt hours supplemental to what we buy from suppliers. And yeah, essentially, this does reduce our weighted average cost of a sale, but it allows us to make a lot more cars and a lot more stationary storage. And then long-term, we're expecting to make on the order of a 3000 gigawatt hours or three terawatt hours per year. I think we've got a good chance of achieving this actually before 2030, but I'm highly confident that we could do it by 2030.

2:11:18But wait, there's more. Yeah. Basically with silicon, the cookie crumbles and gets gooey. That's basically what happens.

2:13:14Yeah. And I'm not sure if you saw this. Basically a dollar per kilowatt hours basically. If you use simple silicon, it's dramatically less than even the silicon that is currently used in the batteries that are made today, and you can use a lot more of it.

2:16:41Yeah. Sure. So in order to scale, we really need to make sure that we're not constrained by total nickel availability. I actually spoke with the CEOs of the biggest mining companies in the world and said, "Please make more nickel, this is very important." And so I think they are going to make more nickel. I think we need to have a kind of a three-tiered approach to batteries.

2:17:07So starting with iron, that's kind of like a medium range, and then nickel manganese as sort of a medium plus intermediate and then high nickel for long range applications like Cyber Truck and the semi. Something like a semi-truck, it's extremely important to have high energy density in order to get long range. And just to give sort of iron up a bit more time, if you look at [inaudible 02:17:37] per kilogram at the cathode level of iron, it looks like nickel's twice as good, but when you fully consider it at the pack level, everything else taken into account, nickel is about maybe 50 or 60% better than iron.

2:17:52So iron is a little better than it would seem, when you look at it at the pack level fully considered. It's not as good as nickel, nickel's like 50 to 60% better, but it's actually pretty good. Good for stationary storage and for medium range applications where energy density is not paramount. And then, like I said, for intermediate, it's kind of a nickel manganese, and it's a relatively straightforward to do a cathode that's two-thirds nickel one third manganese, which would then allow us to make 50% more cell volume with the same amount of nickel.

2:19:34It's insanely complicated. It's a small world journey of, "I am a nickel atom, what happens to me?" And it is crazy. You're going around the world three times, there's the moral equivalent of digging the ditch, filling the ditch and digging the ditch again, it's total madness basically. And these things just grew up, they're just kind of like legacy things, it's like how it was done before and then they connected the dots but really didn't think of the whole thing from a first principle standpoint saying, "How do we get from the nickel ore in the ground to the finished nickel product for a battery?" So we've looked at the entire value chain and said, "How can we make this as simple as possible?"

2:21:45Yeah. To be clear, cathode production would be part of our the Tesla cell production plant. So it would just be basically raw materials coming from the mine and from raw materials in the mine out comes a battery.

2:22:25So it's important to note that there is a massive amount of lithium on earth. So lithium is not like oil. There's a massive amount of it, pretty much everywhere. In fact is there's enough lithium in the United States to convert the entire United States fleet to electric, all the cars in the United States. Like 300 million or something like that. Every vehicle in the United States can be converted to electric using only lithium that is available in the United States.

2:22:59Yeah, people haven't been trying because it's just widely available. But it is important to say, "Okay, what is the smartest way to take ores and extract the lithium and do so in an environmentally friendly way?" And we actually discovered... Again, looking at it a first principles physics standpoint, instead of just the way it's always been done, is we found that we can actually use table salt, sodium chloride, to basically extract the lithium from the ores. Nobody's done this before, to the best of my knowledge, nobody's done this. And all the elements are reusable, it's a very sustainable way of obtaining lithium. And we actually got rights to a lithium clay deposit in Nevada.

2:23:52Over 10,000 acres. And then the nature of the mining is actually also very environmentally sensitive in that we sort of take a chunk of dirt out of the ground, remove the lithium, and then put the chunk of dirt back where it was. So it will look pretty much the same as before, it will not look like terrible. And yeah, it'll be nice.

2:24:27Yeah, that's true. Actually, just what's in Nevada. Basically, there's so much damn lithium on Earth it's crazy. It's one of the most common elements on the planet.

2:25:30To date, it's been done by third parties, but we think we can recycle the batteries more effectively, especially since our batteries, we're making the same battery as the thing we're recycling. Whereas third party recyclers have to consider batteries of all kinds.

2:26:04Yeah. Long-term, new batteries will come from old batteries once the fleet reaches steady state.

2:26:31So there's an architecture that we've been wanting to do at Tesla for a long time, and we've finally figured it out. And I think it's the way that all electric cars in the future will ultimately be made, it's the right way to do things.

2:26:52So it starts with having a single piece casting for the front body and the rear body. And in order to do this, we commissioned the largest casting machine that has ever been made. And it's currently working just over the road at our Fremont plant. It's pretty sweet. Currently making the entire rear section of the car as a single piece, high pressure die-cast aluminum. And in order to do this, we actually had to develop our own alloy because we wanted a high strength casting alloy that did not require coatings or heat treatment. This is a big deal for castings. Especially with a large casting. If you heat treat it afterwards it tends to deform, it kind of does this like potato chip thing. So it's very hard to keep a large casting to have its shape.

2:27:47So in order to achieve this, there was no alloy that existed that could do this, so we developed our own alloy, a special allow of aluminum, that has high strength without heat treat and is very castable. So that's a great achievement of our materials team. In fact, in general, we've got a lot of advanced materials coming for Tesla, new alloys and materials that have never existed before.

2:28:10So, you're basically making the front and rear of the car is a single piece and that then interfaces to what we call it, the structural battery. Where the battery for the first time will have dual use. The battery will both have the use as an energy device and as structure. This is absolutely the way things are done. In the early days of aircraft they would carry the fuel tanks as cargo. So the fuel tanks actually were quite difficult to carry. They're basically worse than cargo, you had to add to kind of bolt them down. It was very difficult. And then somebody said, "Hey, what if we just make the fuel tank in wing shape?" So all modern airplanes, your wing is just a fuel tank in wing shape. This is absolutely the way to do it. And then the fuel tanks serves this dual structure, and it's no longer cargo. It's fundamental to the structure of the aircraft. This was a major breakthrough.

2:30:10What we do essentially, instead of having just a filler that is a flame retardant, which is currently what is in the 3NY battery packs, we have a filler that is a structural adhesive, as well as flame-retardant. So it effectively glues the cells to the top and bottom sheet. And this allows you to do shear transfer between upper and lower sheet. Just like if you have a formula one craft or a racing boat, and you have carbon fiber face sheets and aluminum honeycomb between them, this gives you incredible stiffness and it's really the way that any super fast thing works is you create basically a honeycomb sandwich with two face sheets.

2:30:58This is actually even better than what aircraft do. Because aircraft do not do this. They can't do this because fuel is liquid. So in our case the batteries are solid. So we can actually use the steel shell case of the battery to transfer shear from the upper and lower face sheet, which makes for an incredibly stiff structure, even stiffer than a regular car. In fact, if this was a convertible that had no upper structure, that convertible will be stiffer than a regular car.

2:32:36It also proves what's called the polar moment of inertia. Which is if you think of when there's a ice skater arms out or arms in. Arms in, you rotate faster. So if you can bring things closer to the center, you reduce the polar moment of inertia and that means the car maneuvers better. It just feels better. You won't know why, but it just feels more agile. So it's really cool.

2:33:45Yeah. So major improvements on all fronts from the cell all the way to the vehicle.

2:34:47Yeah. So I think it's pretty nice that investment per gigawatt hour reduction is 69%. I mean, who would have thought?

2:35:03I mean, 0.420%, of course. So what this enables us to do is achieve a new trajectory in the reduction of cell cost. And now to be clear, it will take us probably a year to 18 months to start realizing these advantages and to fully realize the advantages probably it's about three years or thereabouts. So if we could do this instantly we would, but it just really bodes well for the future and means that the long-term scaling of Tesla and the sustainable energy products that we make will be massively increased. So, what tends to happen as companies get bigger is things tend to slow down, actually they're going to speed up.

2:36:04Yeah. Long-term we want to try to replace at least 1% of the total vehicle fleet on Earth, which is about 2 billion vehicles. So long-term, we want to try and make about 20 million vehicles a year.

2:38:02Yeah. So we have and extreme performance and range. And we should probably talk about, more or less, Plaid. What about that? So, yeah. Anyway, we took the latest Plaid out to Laguna Seco on Sunday, it got a minute 30, and we think probably there's another three seconds or more to take off that time. So we're confident the Model Plaid will achieve the best track time of any production vehicle ever, of any kind, two-door or otherwise.

2:39:15And you can order it now. And it's available basically in the next year. And now we'll move to Q&A.

2:39:54Actually, I don't know either. You can maybe get out of the car for two seconds and yell it at us. How are we getting the questions? Speaker 2: [inaudible 02:40:08].

2:40:45Yes, we will be manufacturing cells in Berlin. And they could also stack them. So if you want to say, depending upon the size of your house or whatever, how much you need, you can just basically stack them and just have a very compelling, super efficient home HVAC. And then you could also communicate with the car and it'll know when you're coming home. So it's like, "Oh, I don't need to keep the house cold all day, I'll just cool it down because I knew you were coming home." So the pack can communicate with the car and just really dial it into when you actually need cooling and heating.

2:42:51We'll try to do that. Yeah. I agree, that would be really cool.

2:43:12Well, I don't think there will be at ICE industry longterm. Well, I guess there might be like a few things that it's a like curious thing. There's still like some steam engines made somewhere, but they're just basically sort of quirky collector's items. I mean, that will be the future of the internal combustion engine car.

2:44:09Well, it's hard to say what the volume exactly would be for the cyber truck. The orders are gigantic. We have like, I don't know, well over half a million orders, I think maybe six or 600,000. It's a lot, basically, we stopped counting. So I think there's probably room for, I don't know, at least like a unit volume of like 250 to 300,000 a year, maybe more. Now, we are designing the cyber truck to meet the American spec. Because if you try to design a car to meet the super set of all global requirements you can't make the cyber truck, it's impossible. So it really is designed for the American market, but this is the biggest market. Our North American market is the biggest market for pickup trucks by far or large pickup trucks.

2:44:59And then I think we'll probably make an international version of cyber truck that'll be kind of smaller, kind of like a tight Wolverine package. It'll still be cooler, but it'll be smaller because you just can't make a giant truck like that for most markets. So, yeah, but it's going to be great.

2:45:17And I don't know. I think probably we'll be able to sell directly in Texas. We do pretty well right now, but it is a bit weird not being able to actually conclude a transaction in Texas, but it's got to be like a click on a server based in California. But weirdly we can do leasing in Texas, but not selling. Hopefully that'll get cleared up in the future. Speaker 6: Elon, great job with everything that you're doing. It's Ross Gerber from Gerber Kawasaki. Your team's amazing. What I'm most curious about, these innovations are incredible but on my drive up here fully on autopilot for 400 miles, the entire state is brown and this is ultimately about climate. Has there been some analysis done if all these things are achieved, what will its direct impact be on climate?

2:46:10I think it will have a very significant impact because it will stop the CO2 PPM from growing as it is every year. I should say, I try to view the whole climate thing as a science question as much as possible. Science, you always question your hypothesis, is it true? Is not true? Or assign a probability to a given hypothesis. And I should say that my original interest in electric vehicles predates the climate issue. When I was in high school, I thought, "Man, if we don't figure out electric cars, the whole economy's going to collapse when we run out of oil." So we better figure out electric cars and sustainable energy or civilization's going to crumble.

2:46:57And then it was only later that the significance of the climate risk became apparent. And we were also able, using tracking and other types of technology to access a lot more fossil fuels than previously thought, which is helpful for lowering the cost of gasoline, but it's pretty bad for the total tonnage of CO2 that you could put in the atmosphere. It's now greatly beyond what people previously thought. As we were just going through this presentation, it is a absolutely monumental task to accelerate the advent of sustainable energy. The entire global economy is still more than 99% dependent on, or call it roughly 99% dependent on, fossil fuels.

2:46:57So although electric cars get a lot of press right now, as a percentage of the total global fleet it's practically nothing. I would say yes, less than 1% of the global fleet is electric right now. Because of two billion cars and trucks and whatnot in use. So there's a massive amount of work ahead.

2:46:57Just insane, like hard to comprehend how much work is ahead to get the new vehicle production to be sustainable, to massively increase the amount of stationary storage, which is critical because renewable energy is intermittent, wind, and solar is intermittent, sometimes the wind doesn't blow and this obviously sun doesn't shine at night, so you got to have batteries, a massive, massive number of batteries.

2:49:21That's true. It is a false dichotomy to say that it's either prosperity or sustainability. This is often used by oil and gas to say like, "Oh, well, do you want people to lose their jobs? Do you want to lower people's standards of living? Do you want to make all these economic sacrifices really in order to have sustainability?" And the reality, as Drew was saying, is that sustainable energy is going to be lower cost, not higher cost than fossil fuels. Speaker 7: Elon, quick question for you, right here in front. First, thanks for having everyone. I was telling a friend, the one company to go work for that's going to have the biggest structural...

2:49:21Speaker 8: And the one company to go work for, that's going to have the biggest structural impact over the next 10 years at scale, it's probably Tesla. So kudos to everyone at Tesla for what they've done to this point and going forward. The two questions for you, as you've looked at the auto in the storage markets, I know you've talked about it at kind of 50/50 longterm, but it seems like a lot of the battery cost curve achievements that you presented today, really make some of these storage opportunities much more feasible over the next five years.

2:49:21And so I guess the first part of the question is, does your calculus upon learning and improving these things, change on that 50/50 mix, or is there a role where storage becomes bigger? And then the second part of the question, with all these huge grand visions, who's going to be with Tesla from a corporate perspective, accomplishing these things? Obviously, Tesla can't do it alone, but when you look at some of the traditional auto industry or power, et cetera, I don't see a lot of other Tesla's.

2:50:59Well actually, there's a lot of companies in China that I think are doing great work with electric vehicles and also with stationary storage, although we don't see that much in the US yet, but I think probably we will in the future. I don't know, obviously we're doing everything we can to encourage other companies to move to sustainable transport and also make stationary storage batteries. We made our patents freely available, we really try to tell these companies, "Hey, you really need to do this, or you won't exist in the future," but they don't believe it. So we've talked until we're blue in the face. What are we supposed to do? But we really are hopeful that other companies will also do what we're doing and that will make a sustainable future come sooner.

2:53:12Well, I mean, there are batteries in limited production right now, that do exceed 400 watt hours per kilogram, which I think is about the number you need for a decent range, medium range aircraft. And I think our batteries will, over time, start to approach the 400 watt hours per kilogram range as well. So yeah, I mean, I think over time, we'll see all modes of transport, with the ironic exception of rockets, transition to sustainability or to electric basically. On the rocket front, what we're planning to do is, about 80% of Starship is liquid oxygen and we're actually already running a power line to be able to use wind power to create the liquid oxygen.

2:53:12So we're making some decent progress on sustainability on the rocket front, but there's just no way to have an electric rocket. And it's important for the future of life and consciousness, that we become a multi planet species, so got to keep doing that.

2:56:15I think just making really efficient cars that have lower drag coefficient, low rolling resistance, efficient powertrains, I mean, that's kind of what we've done in order to make iron phosphate still have a good range. So the iron phosphate's a lower energy density solution, but while there are some limitations on the total amount of nickel produced every year, there's really no limit on the iron. There's so much iron it's ridiculous. So you can really scale up iron phosphate at a raw materials basis, more than you can nickel.

2:58:27Yeah. In fact, if there's anything that you guys want to comment on, feel free to step forward and say something. Speaker 10: I think the key is to be smart about your chemistry choices, your materials choices. Talk louder. Speaker 10: Yeah. If you're smart about your materials choices, the spice will continue to flow. You don't need to use the same kind everywhere. It's about strategically planning it out and for miners, I think we are incentivizing them quite a bit, to ramp up their production.

2:59:44We haven't really thought about it that much, but I suppose it's probably something we should think about. We will be providing a title on the Tesla's. So we're providing more music sources that people can choose from and just generally trying to improve the entertainment experience in the cars. And I think actually as we go to a more autonomous future, the importance of entertainment and productivity will become greater and greater.

2:59:44I mean, to the degree that if you're just basically sitting in your car, the car is fully autonomous and driving somewhere, the car is essentially your chauffeur and then the things that become important are, okay, well let's have good entertainment and if you want to do some productivity stuff, then that actually starts to become much more important because you're no longer spending your attention driving the car. So it will be extremely important in the future.

3:00:54Yeah. The first one, I think we already answered. If we're able to make enough cells, which we'll try to do, we will supply other companies. It's definitely not an intentional effort to keep the cells to ourselves, if we can make enough for other companies, we will supply them. And we were trying to do the right thing for advancing the sustainable energy, whatever that is.

3:01:19Vehicle to grid, we get asked that a lot. I think one of the things that's important to note, is vehicle to grid, unless you have a power cutoff, you need to cut off your main supply to the grid, otherwise, if you lose the power in your house, you'll basically just backflow energy to the grid. So just having a reversal in the power flow, does not actually keep the lights on, you need a whole separate system to cut off power to the grid. And I think there's also the case that people really want the freedom to be able to drive and to charge at their house. And it's obviously very problematic if you get to morning and your car, instead of being charged, it discharged into the house and then you're sort of, "Okay, now I can either drive or use the battery to power my house."

3:02:19I think it's actually going to be better for people's freedom of action, to have a power wall and a car separate, and then everything works that. You basically combine that with solar, either solar retrofit or solar glass roof, and local battery storage, so you basically become your own utility and then the car can be charged also with solar. I think that's the stuff that works, that said, we can certainly do vehicle to grid, I think we can basically enable that with software in Europe or something, right?

3:03:49Yeah. Honestly, a vehicle to grid sounds good, but I think actually has a much lower utility than people think. I think very few people would actually use vehicle to grid. With the original roadster, we had vehicle to grid capabilities, nobody used it.

3:04:18How do we find the engineers to do all these things? Well, I guess we recruit a lot of engineers from all parts of the world. I think Tesla has a good reputation for doing exciting engineering and that tends to attract a lot of the top engineers in the world because they know that their efforts at Tesla will really serve the greater good and we're super hardcore about engineering. Tesla is first and foremost an engineering company, it's like hardcore engineering is what we do. The sheer amount of hardcore engineering done at Tesla is insane. And if you look at say, there's various surveys done of engineering schools, where do you want to go, what's your top choices? And actually the top two choices last few years, have been Tesla and SpaceX. So sometimes it's Tesla first and sometimes SpaceX first, but those are the two top ones.

3:05:30Absolutely. And like you said, the battle is far from over. Less than 1% of the global automotive fleet has been converted to electric and even maybe less than 0.1% of stationary storage has been done. So stationary storage has barely begun, converting the global vehicle fleet to electric, has barely begun. So there's still a massive amount of engineering work to be done at Tesla and other companies, to accelerate this transition to sustainability.

3:06:39Yeah. I mean, I think certainly we will try to give back as much as possible to the customers. It's not like Tesla's profitability is crazy high, our average profitability for last four quarters, is maybe 1%. So just to be clear, it's not like we're minting money. Our evaluation makes it seem like we are, but we're not. So we do want to try to make the price as competitive as we can, without losing money. If you keep losing money, you'll just die. So this thing called profit is just like, we need to bring in more money than we spend, otherwise we're dead.

3:07:25Yeah. I mean, it's important to sort of separate the difference between affordability and value for money or desirability of the product. So for a lot of people, they want to buy a Tesla, they simply don't have enough money. We could make the car infinitely desirable, but if somebody does not have enough money, they can't buy it. Sometimes people kind of forget this. People have to have enough money to buy the car and just making a car super desirable, but expensive, does not mean they can afford it. So it's absolutely critical that we make cars that people can actually afford. Go through some of these things, scroll down or something.

3:08:30Yeah. We're already pretty close. And then factoring in total cost of ownership and the fact that electric vehicles require much less servicing and are way cheaper to run, when you look at total cost of ownership. And you can always lease a car, so if you just lease a car or get a loan for a car, you've got your sort of monthly payments and then your cost for either gasoline or electricity and your cost of servicing and the fully considered cost of electric car is much less than a gasoline car of the same nominal purchase price. I mean, that said, maybe on the order of three years, when we can do lower cost, like a $25,000 car, I think that will be basically on par, maybe slightly better than a comparable gasoline car. So I think maybe it's on the order of three years-ish.

3:10:09Yeah, a lot of the things we've already asked really. Guys, is there anything you want to add to... Maybe we can go through everyone and maybe say what you're doing and say a few words. I don't know. Speaker 10: Sure. I just want to reiterate the fact that this is a massive problem.

3:11:25Massive problem. Speaker 10: And it seems like Tesla's on its way and ahead, but we need everybody's help because it's everybody's planet and we're not going to get to 20 terawatt hours by ourselves. So please think about this carefully, as it affects everybody, so let's get on it.

3:11:45Yeah. And obviously, if you care about solving sustainability and doing hardcore engineering, definitely come work for Tesla. Speaker 12: Yeah. We went through a couple of the manufacturing improvements and it kind of looks easy when you put together a nice slide deck, but it's super challenging. When you take materials out of the process, when you integrate processes together, you have to do a lot of things at once and that's like this immense engineering challenge. And so to appreciate that, to get through this, we need the best engineers we've got. And we've got this awesome team, I just want to shout out also to all of our team watching, you guys are awesome, you absolutely kicked ass putting this together.

3:17:23All right. Well, I guess thank you everyone for coming. I hope you liked the presentation. Very exciting future ahead. We're going to work our damnedest to transition the world to sustainable energy as quickly as possible, and your support and help is key to that success. So thanks again, super appreciated and look forward to the next event.

从现场发言里挑出的 10 句原话,附中文译文(AI 翻译,以英文原话为准)。点时间戳可跳到视频对应位置。

美国平均每百万英里大约发生2.1起碰撞,而开启Autopilot时是0.3起。我是说,这是巨大的差别,真的非常大,而且还会变得更好。

The U.S. average for collisions is at roughly 2.1 per million miles, and with autopilot engaged, it's 0.3. I mean, this is a profound difference, really massive, and this will get even better.

我认为制造业总体上被低估了,而设计“制造机器的机器”的难度,远比机器本身大得多。

I think manufacturing is underappreciated in general, and the difficulty of designing the machine that makes the machine is vastly harder than the machine itself.

可持续能源来得更快还是更慢,这件事很重要;这就是我看待特斯拉、评估我们进展的方式。我们把可持续能源加速了多少年?

It matters if sustainable energy happens faster or slower, and so that's really how I think about Tesla and how we should assess our progress. By how many years did we accelerate sustainable energy?

但这么说吧:要让世界转向可再生能源,大约需要连续15到25年、每年20到25太瓦时的电池产能。

But let's say it's like roughly 20 to 25 terawatt hours per year sustained for 15 to 25 years to transition the world to renewable.

我认为,最终每家公司都会拥有自动驾驶,但不是每家公司都能把制造做得极好。特斯拉将在制造上绝对遥遥领先于其他任何公司,这就是我们的目标。

Eventually every company will have autonomy, I think, but not every company will be a great at manufacturing. Tesla will be absolutely head and shoulders above anyone else in manufacturing, that is our goal.

然后长期来看,我们预计每年生产约3000吉瓦时,也就是3太瓦时。我认为我们很有机会在2030年前实现,但我高度确信我们能在2030年前做到。

And then long-term, we're expecting to make on the order of a 3000 gigawatt hours or three terawatt hours per year. I think we've got a good chance of achieving this actually before 2030, but I'm highly confident that we could do it by 2030.

美国的每一辆车都可以仅用美国境内可获得的锂来转换成电动车。

Every vehicle in the United States can be converted to electric using only lithium that is available in the United States.

长期来看,我们希望至少替换掉地球上全部车辆中的1%,也就是约20亿辆车。所以长期来看,我们想努力做到每年生产约2000万辆车。

Long-term we want to try to replace at least 1% of the total vehicle fleet on Earth, which is about 2 billion vehicles. So long-term, we want to try and make about 20 million vehicles a year.

整个全球经济仍然有超过99%依赖化石燃料,或者说大约99%依赖化石燃料。所以,尽管电动车现在很受关注,但放到全球车队总量中,它几乎可以忽略不计。我要说,是的,目前全球车队中电动车的比例还不到1%。

The entire global economy is still more than 99% dependent on, or call it roughly 99% dependent on, fossil fuels. So although electric cars get a lot of press right now, as a percentage of the total global fleet it's practically nothing. I would say yes, less than 1% of the global fleet is electric right now.

全球汽车车队中只有不到1%转换成了电动,而固定式储能可能连0.1%都还没做到。所以固定式储能才刚刚开始,全球车队电动化也才刚刚开始。

Less than 1% of the global automotive fleet has been converted to electric and even maybe less than 0.1% of stationary storage has been done. So stationary storage has barely begun, converting the global vehicle fleet to electric, has barely begun.

资源与出处