访谈·中文精读

罗恩·巴伦采访马斯克(2022年11月4日)

Elon Musk interviewed by Ron Baron (4 November 2022)

中文精读由 AI 基于原始视频与文稿改写,非官方翻译,可能存在偏差或错误;表述以原视频为准。说明

2022年11月4日,罗恩·巴伦(Ron Baron)在台上问了马斯克一个问题:你51岁了,每天干16个小时,一周七天,满世界飞,开不完的会,还总有人在网上骂你。你图什么?

马斯克说,我老婆也这么问我。

我妻子对我说,你为什么还在工作?你在这儿干什么?(马斯克)

他刚下红眼航班,没睡好,自嘲说反应比平时慢一点。51岁,他自己形容是"晚夏的鸡",早就不是春天的小鸡了。

这场对话里,马斯克聊了特斯拉的制造成本、星舰的复用难度、推特的8美元月费、人形机器人对经济规模的含义,还有为什么他要在工厂地板上睡觉。信息密度很高,逻辑散落在闲谈里。下面按主题拆开讲。

他给出的理由,比"改变世界"具体得多

马斯克的回答分两块。

第一块是特斯拉。他说在特斯拉之前,没人认真做电动车。现在因为特斯拉,全世界几乎所有主要车企都在造电动车。这件事本身很大。但把全球能源经济切换到可持续模式,路还长得很,特斯拉的活没干完。

第二块是SpaceX。他的说法是,人类的长期存续需要保险,未来需要让人兴奋。

这里他讲了一段尺度很大的话。地球诞生46亿年,宇宙138亿年,人类发明文字只有5000多年,最早的文字出现在古苏美尔,距今五六千年。如果把演化时间轴摊开,整个文明只是一个瞬间,一次眨眼。

我们应该把意识看作广袤黑暗中的一根小蜡烛。它很容易熄灭。(马斯克)

这句话是他整场对话的底层动机。后面聊火星、聊星舰、聊为什么要花大钱看135亿年前的光,都从这儿长出来。

专利是给弱者的,这话他只说对了一半

巴伦提到马斯克那句著名的玩笑:专利是给弱者的。特斯拉把专利免费开放给同行。

马斯克的补充很实在。他说专利有它合理的地方。有人花了大钱研发,尤其在新药上,要做完三期临床试验,最后做出来的药本身制造成本很低。这种情况下没有专利保护,就没人愿意去做三期临床。所以专利制度有存在的必要。

特斯拉的情况不一样。目标是推动可持续能源,靠一家公司做不成,需要整个行业往这个方向走。所以专利免费给,是为了让同行跑得快一点。

巴伦的观察更狠:就算把专利给了别人,特斯拉还是领先两三年。而且传统车企每卖一辆电动车,就少卖一辆赚钱的燃油车,那些工厂的钱全砸在旧产能上。没人真心想造电动车,都是被逼的。

70亿美元建厂,一年赚150亿

全场最扎人的一组数字在这儿。

特斯拉的车卖3.9万美元,单车利润1.5万到1.6万美元。用70亿美元建一座年产100万辆的工厂,一年赚150亿美元。

马斯克讲这段话的时候自己都停顿了一下。他先讲错了一次,巴伦纠正他,他又重新讲了一遍,语气里带着那种"我知道听起来不像真的"的味道。

投70亿,一年赚150亿。谁做得到?而且这是制造业,是造东西。(马斯克)

巴伦追问,别的公司为什么不学。马斯克说,有些东西学得快,有些学不快。一位其他车企的高管托巴伦引荐,想带着工程总监去奥斯汀工厂参观。巴伦问马斯克答不答应,马斯克的逻辑很简单:等他们看明白、复制出来,特斯拉已经换到下一个东西上了。

降成本的手段里,他点了一个:一体化压铸。现在后车身一半一体压铸成型,接下来前车身也要这么做。少一堆零件,少一堆工序。

五步算法,和他自己搞反的顺序

马斯克在台上讲了一套他称为"第一性原理算法"的东西,说对任何设计和制造都有用。五步,顺序不能乱。

  1. 把你拿到的需求变得不那么蠢。任何约束和需求,多少都有点蠢。需求必须来自一个能解释它的人,不能来自一个部门,否则你找不到该问谁。
  2. 删掉零件,删掉工序。这一步听起来极其显然,但他们反复发现,有些零件根本不需要,只是"以防万一"放进去的,或者干脆是失误。有些工序是某人以为需要,实际不需要。
  3. 简化和优化。
  4. 加速。
  5. 自动化。

讲完这五步,他自己认了个错:在Model 3产能爬坡的时候,他顺序完全搞反了。先上自动化,再想办法加速,然后才简化,最后才想到删除。

我重复这套东西是给我自己听的,因为我第一次全做反了。(马斯克)

三块玻纤垫和一根没用的横梁

他举了两个例子,都属于"公司里怎么会有这种事"的类型。

第一个。电池包上面贴了三块玻纤垫,只覆盖电池包一部分。这道工序在电池产线上,是卡产能的头号瓶颈,工人得把这三块垫子粘上去。马斯克问为什么要贴。负责噪音和振动控制的团队说,这是电池安全团队要求的,防起火。他去问电池安全团队,对方说,这是为了噪音和振动。

两边互相以为对方要的。他们最后安排两台车,各放一个麦克风,一台贴一台不贴,开起来听不出区别。这个零件本来就不该存在。

第二个。Model 3的车身产线上有个激光焊接工位,焊一根横在副驾脚部的小横梁。整个工厂因为这个工位停摆。马斯克盯着那根梁问,这玩意儿到底干什么用。生产团队说,碰撞安全。他打电话给碰撞安全团队,对方说,那个没用,应该删掉。

碰撞安全团队忘了告诉生产团队。

说实话,这类事情让你觉得自己活在一幅《呆伯特》漫画里。(马斯克)

他顺势提了个词:呆伯特比例。任何公司都有这个比例,不可能为零,能做的是尽量压低。

睡在桌子底下,是为了让换班的人看见

巴伦问他,这些事都是你亲自干的?马斯克说,就是我。他在弗里蒙特和內华达的工厂里住了三年,那是他的主要住所,不是开玩笑。

一开始他睡在屋顶帐篷里的一张沙发上。后来沙发也不用了,直接睡在厂房开阔处的办公桌底下地板上。这件事跟表演吃苦没关系,他要的效果很具体:换班的时候,整个团队都能看到他。

如果团队觉得他们的头儿在某个热带岛上喝着迈代鸡尾酒享乐,那情况就完全不一样了。我本可以那样,我也更想那样,我不是受虐狂。(马斯克)

地板睡起来很难受,每次醒来身上一股金属粉尘味。但他说,团队看得见他,这一点差别巨大,然后大家就拼了。

星舰:游戏难度调到极限

聊到星舰,马斯克的语气变了。他说让人类成为多行星物种、成为航天文明,那个卡脖子的突破只有一个:完全且快速可复用的轨道级火箭。

猎鹰9号已经走了一大半路。助推器能回来着陆,整流罩能回收,但二级不回收。所以他给猎鹰9号的复用程度打了个分:70%到80%。星舰要做的是100%。

这个差别有多大?他的说法是,完全可快速复用的轨道火箭,有潜力把进入太空的成本降低1000倍。一千倍。

星舰本身也是个大东西。推力是土星五号的两倍多,质量大约两倍。整艘船设计成推进式着陆,也就是靠发动机反推降落,这意味着它能降落在太阳系任何一个固体表面上。

巴伦问,为什么这么难,为什么别人不做。

马斯克的回答很干脆:所有人都说这不可能。地球重力很强,大气很厚,以已知的物理学,造出完全可复用的轨道火箭只是勉强可能。

如果这是一款电子游戏,难度设置是极限难度。不是不可能,是极限难度。(马斯克)

他补了一句关键的:以前搞火箭的人不是不知道复用这回事。飞机和汽车都是可复用的。火箭要复用,每个环节都必须做到极致。发动机效率要极高,结构效率要极高,航电和软件要先进,还要有超轻的再入隔热罩。要去火星,还得有轨道加注,就像空军做空中加油那样,先把飞船送上去,再发 tanker 上去补燃料。

这些条件以前从没同时满足过。历史上有很多次尝试,基本都失败了,多数项目在判断"不可能了"之后就取消了。

900亿美元的SLS和36万个工作岗位

巴伦把话题引到NASA的SLS火箭上。SLS在2010年拿到合同,原定花100亿美元,采用成本加成合同,现在涨到400亿,还有人说最终会到900亿甚至1000亿,而且到现在没拿出什么成果。

对比很刺眼:星舰比SLS高10米,而且能复用。

巴伦问,别人不按你们这套做,怎么可能竞争得过?他们又怎么拿到合同的?

马斯克这时候明显收了收:

我在这儿说话得小心点。我敌人已经够多了,希望想让我死的公司数量能少一些。(马斯克)

然后他还是把话说完了。NASA的说法是一年花200亿美元,顺带支撑36万个工作岗位,分布在各州的国会选区。这话他没往下接,但意思在场的人都懂。

韦伯望远镜能带来什么

巴伦问了个很实在的问题:看135亿年前的光,对我们有什么用?能开发出什么技术?

马斯克说,成为多行星物种、成为航天文明、最终走出太阳系探索银河,动机有两个。

第一个是防御性的。宇宙里可能有很多单行星文明,几百万年前就死掉了,始终没能走到第二颗行星上。地球上的人类要面对的风险,恐龙当年不用面对。恐龙只需要担心陨石和火山,人类有核武器,有生物恐怖主义,自己就能把自己干掉。这个概率不是零。

第二个动机是激励。

生活不能只是解决一个又一个问题。人需要有被打动的理由,需要早上醒来时想,我真想看看接下来会发生什么。(马斯克)

他说去火星这件事,绝大多数人不会亲自去,也不该去。那是苦差事,跟豪华旅行沾不上边。但看着它发生,本身就有巨大的鼓舞作用,就像当年的阿波罗计划。他提到一个细节:你去问任何国家的人,20世纪人类最伟大的成就是什么,答案大概率是登月。所以才有"moonshot"这个词。还有人问他登月是不是真的,他说是真的。

440亿美元买的东西,跟现在没关系

马斯克自己承认,按2022年市场的走势看,这个价格偏高。但他强调判断基准不一样:他下注的对象在推特将来能变成什么样,眼下这副样子他没什么兴趣。

他们卖的那个东西我们没买,我们买的是它将要成为的样子。(马斯克)

他的判断是,这里面潜力巨大,实现起来会非常难,但有可能,最终推特可能成为世界上最有价值的公司之一。

巴伦问得直接:你手里握着媒体,等于握着这个国家甚至世界的未来。反犹言论怎么防?种族歧视词怎么防?TikTok 用观看行为训练算法,你怎么就不能做一个更好的算法?

马斯克的回答分两层。第一层是政策没变:推特的仇恨言论规则没有改动,也不允许仇恨言论。他承认出现过奇怪的有组织攻击,有人临时把仇恨内容发上去,但都被立刻删掉了。

第二层是机制。他要把Twitter Blue做成大规模的支付验证体系,价格是每月8美元。他自己说,有些抱怨这个价格的人,一杯拿铁就花得比这多。

这8美元的作用不只是认证身份,更是抬高作恶成本。

8美元如何让犯罪不划算

马斯克算了一笔账。现在在推特上注册一个机器人账号,成本不到一美分。作恶太便宜,所以垃圾信息、机器人、水军、舆论操纵层出不穷。

如果每个账号背后都要绑定一个每月8美元的支付方式,情况就变了。想开10万个假号,每月要花80万美元,而不是800美元。

如果一个人有可能损失8美元,那10万个假账号就太贵了。(马斯克)

而且支付系统本身带身份验证,苹果的验证体系又加了一层。他的设计是:搜索、回复、提及,全部优先展示已验证用户。时间一长,验证用户基本总在评论区顶端,未验证的机器人和水军被压到很下面,要翻很久才看得到。

他拿谷歌做类比。谷歌搜索结果第8页、第9页全是骗局,但第1页质量足够好,所以没人翻到第8页。他讲了个老笑话:藏尸体的最好地方,是谷歌搜索结果的第二页,因为没人去那儿。

8美元买的东西不止一个蓝标。马斯克说要拿这笔钱做三件事:长视频、长音频播客,以及给内容创作者分成。他点出了推特的尴尬现状:大量创作者在推特上贴 YouTube 和 TikTok 的链接,因为推特连视频时长都不够,更别说给创作者一分钱。这个要改。

广告收入掉了,他说这是对第一修正案的攻击

巴伦提到当天推特裁掉了一半人。马斯克纠正了一个数字:省下的不是40亿美元一年,是4亿。

他解释,在收购谈判开始之前,推特的收入和成本就已经有严重问题。所有依赖广告的公司这一年都难,Snap、谷歌、Meta 的广告收入都在掉。推特的处境更脆弱,因为它的广告里大品牌广告占比高,直接响应类广告占比低。大品牌广告是可选支出,经济一紧,先砍的就是这块。

还有一层:一些激进组织在施压主要广告主,要求他们停止在推特投放。马斯克说,推特这边把能做的都做了,反复说明审核规则和仇恨言论规则没有变化,也一直在执行,但广告主还是走了,推特广告收入出现大幅下滑。

如果激进组织能施压广告主,让广告主去压制言论自由,那这不对劲。我认为这是对第一修正案的攻击。(马斯克)

他也交代了自己的状态:工作量从每周七八十小时涨到大约120小时,睡醒就干活,一周七天,要持续一阵子,没得选。但他判断,一旦推特走上正轨,管理它要比管理 SpaceX 或特斯拉容易得多。

他补了一句底气:互联网软件他做了20年,x.com 后来成了 PayPal,他是核心人物之一。

22年前那份没留副本的计划书

这里有个细节值得单独拎出来。

马斯克说,2000年7月他写过一份产品计划,当时的想法是做出世界上最有价值的金融机构。他说自己后悔没留一份副本。现在他要执行22年前那个计划,加上一些改进。他的原话是,难以置信的是,这22年里没人做过这件事。

我要执行22年前那份 x.com 的计划。这会做出一个好得多的 PayPal。(马斯克)

这话透露出他对推特的定位:社交平台只是入口,支付和金融才是终局。

数字城市广场要装下80%的人

巴伦提到马斯克说过的一句话:要让极左的20%和极右的20%都讨厌你。

马斯克纠正了措辞。他不想让人讨厌,但极端分子确实很难满足,除非你完全接受他们那套教条。

我确信我们能满足80%的美国人,甚至80%的世界。但两边最极端的那10%,可能满足不了。这算是很好的结果了。(马斯克)

他还提了一个产品思路:让用户自己选体验强度。有人把推特当轻音乐电台,就想看看花花草草和风景照;有人要重金属,想在法律允许范围内跟人激烈对喷。这两种人都该能选。

交付、垂直整合和被逼出来的护城河

聊回特斯拉。当年的目标是年底达到每周4万辆,算下来大约15秒下线一辆车。这个速度一年是200万辆,而全球一年造1亿辆车。

Q3财报被批评在途车辆太多,马斯克的解释是最后几周运力不够:汽车运输船和承运车都不够用。他说长期看,把交付曲线拉平、季末留一些车在路上反而是好事,不用为了赶季末交付付一堆加急费。自动驾驶和自动驾驶卡车会解决一部分运输问题,车也可以自己开到用户那儿。

供应链的问题更有意思。外界以为特斯拉供应链管理特别聪明,马斯克说,真实原因是被逼的。2010年代,一家美国汽车创业公司几乎不可能成功,上一次成功的美国车企是1930年代的克莱斯勒,之后一百年没有第二家。所以最好的供应商根本不搭理特斯拉,他们只能自己造。

我们不得不高度垂直整合,否则根本造不出车。(马斯克)

结果这件事变成了资产。因为什么都自己做过,他们真正理解了整条供应链,然后设计出一台集成度更高、零件更少、更便宜、更轻、性能更好的车。

但事情在变。马斯克说,电池的某些关键原材料,特斯拉越来越可能需要自己下场做采矿和精炼。他没有投资嘉能可(Glencore)的打算,说的是特斯拉自己干。

为什么是特斯拉,不是奔驰

现场有人问了个尖锐问题:特斯拉股价从高点跌了40%,市盈率还有70倍;奔驰已经在造电动车,市盈率6倍,股息5%。凭什么买特斯拉?

马斯克先说,他很少劝人买特斯拉,还多次说过股价太高,但大家照买不误。

然后他讲了两个理由,都很硬。

第一个是自动驾驶。他的原话是,在通用自动驾驶这件事上,没有一家公司接近特斯拉。而自动驾驶会让车的价值发生质变:现在一辆车一周只开10到12小时,一天一个半小时左右,一周有168小时。如果能自动驾驶,车一周能跑50到60小时,效用提升五倍,而制造成本一点没变。

一家毛利率25%到30%的公司,产品突然值五倍,按未来现金流折现算,数字会大到让人不敢算。

第二个是Optimus人形机器人。马斯克的经济学推导很短:经济总量等于人均产出乘以人口。如果有了有用的人形机器人,人口这个约束就不存在了,经济规模的上限也说不清了。而这套能力来自特斯拉在自动驾驶上积累的制造和智能技术。

路灯杆充电和僵尸末日

最后一个问题关于充电网络。提问者提了个方案:全球有4亿盏路灯,每盏都有持续供电,可以把一部分改造成充电桩,这是最省钱的大规模铺开方式。

马斯克说伦敦等一些城市已经在这么做。特斯拉超级充电站的长期目标是自己配太阳能和电池,白天发电,本地电池储能供夜间使用,让站点尽可能自给自足。

这样即使僵尸末日来了,特斯拉超充站也能继续工作。谁知道呢,那天总会来的,只是时间问题。(马斯克)

散场前他还在推销:请用推特,请订阅 Twitter Blue,8美元一个月,严格说是7.99美元,便宜一点。

这场对话真正值钱的地方

把整场访谈串起来看,马斯克讲的东西有一条主线:成本在图纸上就定了,靠事后抠是抠不出来的。

一体化压铸、删掉不需要的零件、把需求追溯到具体的人、先删再简化再加速最后才自动化,这些东西听着像制造业常识,但他在Model 3上把顺序做反过,付出过代价。他反复讲那两个玻纤垫和横梁的例子,是因为这类荒唐在大多数公司里天天发生,只是没人去问"这东西到底干什么用"。

第二条线是把不可能的事拆成一组必须同时成立的工程条件。完全复用火箭之所以难,原因不在没人想到。发动机效率、结构效率、航电软件、隔热罩、轨道加注这五件事必须同时做到极致,少一件就全盘失败。他说这是极限难度,不是不可能。

第三条线是他给推特的定位压根不在社交软件上。8美元月费是支付验证,验证是为了抬高作恶成本,抬高成本是为了让内容生态可控,可控之后才能装支付和金融。22年前那份 x.com 计划书,才是他真正想做的事。

至于他为什么还在工作,他自己给的答案没有煽情成分:意识是黑暗里的一根小蜡烛,很容易灭,得让它继续亮着。

  • 检查你手上最重要的项目,找出那个"没人说得清为什么存在"的零件或流程。像马斯克问那根横梁一样,直接找到提需求的人问一句:这个到底解决什么问题?很多时候你会发现,两个团队在互相以为对方需要。
  • 审视你做事的顺序。有没有在还没删掉冗余步骤之前,就急着上自动化、上工具、加人?先删,再简化,再加速,最后才自动化,顺序错了前面全白干。
  • 把你团队的关键节点变得可见。马斯克睡地板跟表演吃苦无关,目的是让换班的人看见他还在。远程和分布式团队也一样,让关键决策过程被看见,比任何动员讲话有用。
  • 算一遍作恶成本。如果你在做社区、平台或任何有滥用风险的产品,别只靠审核规则,去调成本参数。把作恶的单价从一美分抬到8美元,效果比写十页规定强。
  • 把"现在的价格"和"将来的样子"分开算。评估任何资产、项目或职业选择时,这两件事别混在一起。市场给的是当下,你下注的是它变成什么,前提是你能说清变成什么、为什么是你。
语音识别自动转录(Whisper),含全部发言人,可能有识别错误。已按语句合并成段落,并去掉 um、uh 等口头填充词。

0:07I tell you something. Every time I see that clip, it chills me. Every single time. And I look at it a lot. So thank you very much for coming here. I know it's not convenient, it's not around the corner. I'm really appreciative. Absolutely. Thank you for having me. I was on a red-eye flight, so I'm a little slow at the normal.

0:31I didn't get much sleep. You know, that's sort of my first question. Is that so you're 51? Yeah And those bring I think I'm safely not a spring chicken anymore Late summer chicken But just but you I mean look great They're 51 and You do 16 hour days and you work seven hours a week and you fly all over the place and you go to these meetings constantly and

1:07And people constantly criticize you for everything. It's amazing to me. I mean, you're changing the world and you're giving yourself. Why do you do this? So my wife says to me, why are you still working? Why are you still working? What are you doing here? Well, I think that what I'm working on has an important effect on the future.

1:29In the case of Tesla, I think it's fair to say that Tesla has significantly accelerated the advent of sustainable energy. You know, before Tesla, no one was doing electric cars. And now, as a result of Tesla, I think almost every major car company in the world is building electric cars.

1:51And that's a pretty big deal. But there's still a long way to go to transition the world to a sustainable energy economy. And so we still have a lot of work ahead of us at Tesla. but that's our goal there. And then for SpaceX, I think it's important for the future to be exciting and for humanities existence

2:16to be insured over the long term. I think we must become a multi-planet species and a space-bearing civilization. You know, I think the, we're here like 4 and 1 half billion years after Earth got started, 13.8 billion years into the age of the universe. It's only now recently in the last 5,000 years that we invented writing.

2:48I would say date the first civilization by when there was the first writing, which was in ancient Sumeria around 5 or 6,000 years ago. So we've basically just been here for a very brief instance. A blink. All of human civilization is a blink of an eye, if there was an eye, on evolutionary timescale.

3:16So I think it's important we take the actions to ensure that the light of consciousness continues. Because we should really view consciousness as a small candle in a vast darkness. It could easily go out. So you have these missions and somehow, whenever you have a mission and you have this vision and you are a visionary,

3:40that somehow, whatever you do, you develop other businesses. So when you started SpaceX, you didn't think about satellites. When you started Tesla, you didn't think about robots. When you don't have enough people, you didn't think about robots. And so you didn't think about autonomous driving.

3:58And without Elon, there would not be electric cars. Nobody who makes cars wants to make electric cars. They're being forced to make them. In fact, every time they sell electric cars, they sell one fewer car that they make money on. And they have all that money invested in plants that make those other cars.

4:16So nobody wants to have these cars except for him. And everybody thought it was going to fail. So one of the things you said is that patents are for the week. And you share your patents. And with other companies, of course, on the other hand, when they get your patents, you're two or three years ahead of them.

4:37Well, I mean, joking about patents for the week, I think there is a role for patents. Let's say if somebody's spent, if somebody's spent a lot of money developing, in particular medicine, and had to go through the expense of stage three medical trials, and then they finally get something that is approved, but where the drug itself is cheap to manufacture,

4:59then I think a patent in that case makes sense, otherwise no one would go to the trouble of doing stage three medical trials. So there are definitely roles for patents. In the case of Tesla, our goal is to advance sustainable energy. And we can't just do it by ourselves. We need the whole industry to go that way.

5:20So we gave them our patents for free in order to help them accelerate electric vehicles. So must be terrifying to other companies to realize that we make cars. It's $39,000 and cost the car. And we're making $15,000, $16,000 in profit a car. And so we invest $7 billion, and we make $15 billion a year.

5:45I'm sorry, yeah. And 15, right. 15 million cars, 15,000, 15 million a year on a $7 million investment. Shocking. So no one else does that. And when we're, and here you're telling us how, you want to make cars for $20,000 a piece. How do you do that? Well, we've not formally announced our next car program.

6:13So I can't talk too much about our upcoming vehicle program programs that have not been announced. But we do expect to make cars that are more affordable than the current Model 3 or Model Y. And a big factor in this is, yeah. But I think by far the biggest factor is autonomy in terms of the value of a car, because right

6:50now cars get driven for about 10 or 12 hours a week, like maybe one and a half hours a day. And so, but there's 168 hours a week. So if there were autonomous, you could probably drive, the cars could drive for 50 or 60 hours. So you would see a five-fold increase in the utility of the car, you know, that could be autonomy.

7:16This is a really, really gigantic thing. It would also mean that there was, we wouldn't need anywhere near as many parking lots. And this would also be helpful for the environment because you would need far fewer cars. So I misspoke, it was a $7 billion investment for a plant that makes a million cars a year

7:36that makes $15 billion in profits. You invest $7 billion and you make $15 billion a year. Who does that? And for a plant that makes things manufacturing. And so the way this is accomplished is that so you're doing it with casting right now and We cast the half of the car and we soon cast the other half of the car.

8:00And other companies, why don't they try? Why don't they try to do what we're doing? In fact, one of the executives of another automobile company wanted me to introduce her to you. And you did that once in a meeting and now she wants to come visit with her Director of Engineering, our plant in Austin.

8:20And I presume when I ask you, you're going to say, yeah, bring her on because you innovate It's so fast by the time anyone copies what we're doing, it's going to something else. What else is there? When you're casting, what else is there that enables us to make that cheaper? We're eliminating a lot of other parts, we're eliminating functions.

8:39What are we doing to do that? How do we sell a car that's so cheap? I mean, I think the full explanation or at least an accurate explanation would take a long time because the first approximation, a car is made of 10,000 unique parts and prices steps. And I mean Tesla is really I think at this point probably the best at

9:06manufacturing in the auto industry which I think nobody was expecting. Probably in history of the world. Probably. Yeah so I've got this like first

9:25principles algorithm that are fine to be very helpful in the design and manufacturing of anything. People here may find it helpful. The first thing you should do is make the requirements that you've been given a less dumb. Whatever constraints and requirements were given, there were some degree down and you want to make them less dumb. If you don't

9:55do that, start with this, then you answer the right, you get the right answer to the wrong question. And the requirements must be given from a person who can explain the requirement, not from a department, because then you don't know who to talk to. Then step two is delete the part or delete the process step. This sounds extremely obvious and yet over and over again

10:24we have found that parts were not needed. They were just put in there just in case or by mistake or there was a step that people someone thought was needed but was not actually needed. The sounds are saying the obvious but we have deleted so many parts from the car that were did nothing.

10:44They were just there? Well, yeah, I mean, I could give you so many examples. One example was there were three fiberglass mats on top of the battery pack. They partially covered the battery pack. And it was on the battery pack production line, and it was the number one thing choking battery

11:09prep pack production with these gluing on these three five last mats to the top of the battery pack. And so the reason I repeat this all for myself is that I first did things backwards. First, I try to automate it. Then I try to accelerate it, just have the go faster. Then I try to simplify it.

11:33And only then did I delete it. Because it turned out that the team at Tesla that does noise and vibration minimization,

11:49so making the car quiet, thought that the fiberglass mats were there because of the battery safety team, which was for battery fire prevention. And then I asked the battery fire prevention team what they needed for, and they said, noise and vibration. I'm like, okay. So then we had two cars drive, one with a microphone

12:12in the car, in each car, and you could not tell the difference. So we went to all that trouble for a part that should not exist. And then another example was there was a, again, this was like, these were choke points in the entire production system. That's why they, I'm running around the production line trying to fix the production line just like a maniac

12:36It was a Tasmanian devil just running around the factory like a winner's egg and Let's see we have the the body production line a model through we at one point stuck because That we had a laser welding cell to Weld a small cross-car beam in the passenger footwell of the of the front seats

12:58And I'm looking at this sort of this beam and I'm like, what the heck does that do? Because the entire factory stopped trying to get the laser weld cell to work. And I'm like, I can't imagine what useful thing it could do. And the production team said, oh, that's for crash safety.

13:19So then I called the crash safety team and said, is this for crash safety? And said, oh, no, that didn't do anything. We should delete it. I turned out to be totally useless. They forgot to tell the production team. So, honestly, a bunch of these things just feel like you're living in a Dilbert cartoon.

13:37Oh, no. What's that? I mean, any given company, they should have like, what's your Dilbert ratio? Okay. It's not zero. So, is this you or is this your core? Dilbert question. Try to keep it low. So, is this you or is this, so you do all these different things? different things. You know, it's literally me.

14:00So, do you have... Someone else who did this, I was in the factory in Fremont and Nevada for three years straight. It was my primary residence. Not kidding, literally. Did you keep the couch? I actually stepped in a couch at one point in a tent on the roof. And then for a while there I was just sleeping under my desk which is out in the open in the

14:28factory and for an important reason. And it was damn uncomfortable sleeping on that floor and always when I woke up I'd smell like metal dust. We went to visit and they bought him a new couch. Yeah. But actually I stopped using the couch in the, because there's a little complimentary room

14:46in the couch there, I stopped using the couch I just slept on the floor under my desk so during shift change, the entire team could see me. And this is important because, like, you know, the team, like, if they think that the sort of, their leader is off somewhere having a good time, you know, drinking my ties on Tropical Island, which I could definitely have been doing, and would much have preferred to do, I'm not actually a masochist, I think.

15:17But the thing is that since the team could see me sleeping on the floor during shift change just with nothing, they knew I was there. And that made a huge difference. And then they gave it their role. So the focus is on always lowering costs and providing leadership. In this company, we're doing a million and a half cars a year, but expected to 20.

15:51So what happens in 10 years if you're not there? What happens in five years if you're not there? How does that work? Are there all these people? So in all the engineering schools, the top engineering schools, the top choice of where everybody wants to work is test their SpaceX. Those two places.

16:09So do we have all these people coming up and writing each other for the job, or they're working together, how do you get people to say, gee, I could buy that real expensive house, but I'm not gonna do that. Boy, I could buy, I could go out on vacation. I'm not gonna, I was, I'm, Well, we do have that problem a little bit.

16:26So, you know, as a company has prosperity and then people become wealthy, then for a lot of people, you know, that once they become past, it's sort of independently wealthy, they just can't bring themselves to work, that they don't want to work. And that's totally understandable, I'm no judgment.

16:47And so I mean, I have a lot of friends who are extremely talented. And they had some success earlier in life, and they just decided that was enough trauma. And one of my good friends of mine is saying like starting a company is like eating glass and staring into the abyss. So my people will tell me, what can you do to encourage entrepreneurs to start companies?

17:21I'm like, if you need encouragement, don't start a company.

17:36In SpaceX. And so we have, no, competitors sort of, I guess. So SLS. And you know, I read about, that's not it, you know. Just bowing Northropine Lockheed. And with those guys, when they build a launching pad, it took them like 10 years and billions of dollars. And we had a build of a launching pad and it cost a few hundred million dollars and did it in six months.

18:10And then I was interested in how that was done. And the woman I'm talking to says that, Ron, did you see the plumbing when you went there? I said, why should it cost hundreds of millions? It looks like it's a landing field. And I said, would you see what's underneath? Did you see the plumbing?

18:26I said, no, they didn't show that to me. And she said, well, you should be aware that there's all these pipes that take away the heat. And then they all deliver fuel to the rocket. And it has to be there in an exact right amount at the exact right time. And if it's not, that doesn't happen, it blows up.

18:43And he says, well, how does Elon know this? And because you hire these great people, and then you ask them all these questions, and then somehow you remember everything I tell you. Is that true? Well, my memory for technical matters is very good. And I think probably a lot of people don't realize, like, what I do, apes in the time is

19:08engineering. So it's quite rare for me to give a talk. And my day-to-day work at SpaceX and Tesla is almost entirely engineering and design. So and also production. Production is key, but although I consider that to be part of engineering. Yeah. So Starship is something special.

19:40The thing that is like the holy grail, like the critical breakthrough needed to make life multi-planetary and for humanity to be a space-bearing civilization is a fully and rapidly reusable rocket, orbital rocket. And so we've gone most of the way there with Falcon 9. We may have seen the rocket glues to come back and land, and we also recover the nose cone or faring, but we do not recover the upper stage.

20:12So we've gone to the point where we're about 70% to 80% reusable with Falcon 9. With Starship, we're going for 100% reusable. I cannot, it's able to say how profound a change this will be, but a fully and rapidly reusable orbital rocket has the potential to drop the cost of access to space by a factor of a thousand.

20:42About a thousand. A thousand. Okay. And I should say also, Starship is, it's a very big rocket. It's more than twice the thrust of a Saturn V and about twice the mass. And it's also, the entire ship is designed to land propulsively. So it can land propulsively. To do what I didn't hear?

21:10To land on its engines, to land propulsively. So it can land on any solid surface in the solar system. So if we can make Starship work, then it enables us to, over time, get anywhere in the solar system. So why is it so hard? Why don't other people do the same thing? Okay, everyone says it's impossible.

21:31And how much harder is it to do what we're trying to do than we're doing with Falcon? Well, so let's see, both gravity is actually quite strong and we have a thick atmosphere. So with known physics, it is only barely possible to make a fully reusable orbital rocket, only barely possible.

21:57This was a video game, the setting is extreme difficulty. not impossible but extreme difficulty. Because it's not like those who have developed rockets before weren't aware of reusability. They were fully aware of rockets. They're fully aware of reusability. The aircraft and cars are reusable.

22:18It's just that in order for a rocket to be reusable, everything has to be perfect. So you have to have exceptionally efficient engines. You have to have an exceptionally efficient structure. You need advanced avionics and software. You need a very lightweight heat shield for orbital reentry.

22:45And then another key factor for traveling to Mars is you need orbital refilling so that you get the ship to orbit. And then you send up tankers to refill the ship in orbit, just like is done by the Air Force with aerial refueling. Those are the things that are necessary and it's never been achieved before.

23:12There've been many attempts to achieve it and they've all been, basically they all failed and they usually had canceled the program part way through once they thought it was no longer possible. So it's a very difficult engineering challenge. So SLS is supposed to get to the moon.

23:31They got a contract in 2010. And it was supposed to be for $10 billion, but it was cost plus. It's now up to $40 billion. And they say it's going to be $100 billion and $90 billion. And we haven't gotten anything. And we have our rocket is 10 meters taller than theirs. And we can reuse ours.

23:57So how can anyone possibly compete if they're not doing what we're doing? How can they compete? I don't understand. And how can they get contracts? And then I just saw something from NASA. And they said that we're spending $20 billion a year. And oh, by the way, that's 360,000 jobs in all these congressional districts.

24:18Well, I think I'd be careful of what I say here. I have enough enemies. I would like to have smaller number of companies that want me to die. That would be great. But like I said, you know, I think part of this is like what's the goal?

25:03You know, in the case of Starship, the goal is to lower the cost of access to orbit and ultimately to Mars and the Moon and elsewhere to the point where humanity can actually afford to become a multi-planet species to the point where we can afford to have a permanent based on the moon and ultimately far exceed the high watermark of Apollo, which was incredible,

25:28and I think, aspiring to all of humanity, everyone. If you were to ask people, I think, in any country, not Americans, anyone, what was the greatest, what was humanity's greatest achievement in the 20th century? Maybe everyone. space to go to the moon. And that's why they say moonshot as a metaphor. Because that was

25:54incredible. You know, it's so amazing that there was achieved. In fact, a lot of people asked me, was it real? I'm like, yeah, it was real. Well, it's probably on Twitter. That's where they asked that. Yeah. I mean that was just an incredible achievement and I think it's just one of those things that

26:21you know going to the moon makes you proud to be a member of humanity you know it's like for all mankind you know that's that it was for all mankind. So it was amazing achievements and now we have this web telescope you can you I guess the big bang was 14 billion years ago, and first light is 13 and a half billion years ago, and our plan is 4 and a half billion.

26:48So what do we get out of this? What is the, so obviously, Starlink, a really big deal, a trillion dollar opportunity, maybe, maybe more. And, maybe. So what do we get out of seeing back 13 and a half billion years? 13 and a half billion years. What does that do for us? What technology do we develop?

27:12Do we know what we don't know until we do it? Yeah, I think, yeah. I think like there's two main motivations, I think, for becoming a multi-planet species and a space-bearing civilization and then ultimately going beyond that to go to other star systems and explore the galaxy. And I think we may find that there's many one planet civilizations that died out millions

27:47of years ago and never made it to the second planet. Do you think in your lifetime that happens? That I will turn to how long I live. Maybe forever. You know, if I keep increasing that enemy's list, it might not be much longer. We deeply are on it if it's someone angry on Twitter that takes me out.

28:10Well, now you keep a wolf Twitter. Yeah, exactly. So anyway, I think there's two reasons for life to become multi-planetary. Life as we know it to become multi-planetary. I think one is the defensive reason where we just, I think we want the light of consciousness to not be extinguished if something would happen to Earth.

28:36And in the case of the dinosaurs, They only had to worry about like, you know, meteors and two volcanoes and other things. But for us humans, we actually have the power to destroy ourselves with nuclear weapons or some sort of, you know, crazy bio-terrorism thing. So, you know, so there's some danger that is not zero that could cause the end of life

29:05on earth as we know it. So that's kind of the defensive reason to ensure that life is not just and consciousness is just it's not only on earth That's the defensive reason to protect the future of consciousness Then the other big reason I think is that it's exciting and it's it's adventurous and

29:28It's it's it's inspiring and makes it like It makes you think positively about the future. Life can't just be about solving one problem or another. There needs to be reasons to be inspired. Reasons to move your heart and say yes, the future is going to be great. When you wake up in the morning, I can't wait to see what happens next.

29:56And I think that's, you know, humanity, go to Mars. Even if you don't, yourself want to go to Mars, and most people don't, just watch it. It's a tough gig, frankly. This would not be a luxury expedition. But you'd be able to watch it happen, and I think it would just be incredibly inspiring to the world in the same way that the Apollo program was inspiring to the world.

30:23And like I said, there's got to be, Life can't just be about solving one problem or another. We need things that make us excited and inspired about the future, and that would be one of them. So let's go to Twitter just for a minute, and we'll go back to this stuff, which is more interesting to me.

30:47I try to get out of the deal. I told you, you wanted to ask to get out. I can get back here. I reminded that scene from the Godfather, basically. you told me you wanted to ask tough questions. So in Twitter. What could

31:12possibly go wrong? So I saw this article. It says you bought something called Twitter. And it says, must put off lifting Twitter bands. And so obviously the big deal to me anyway in Twitter is that so we have this incredible, it was incredibly poorly managed this business and but those guys somehow did great for their shareholders by selling

31:43it to us. But we didn't buy what they're selling, we bought something of what it's going to become. Yes, I mean I think it's, most people would say like you're given how the market has evolved this year of the prices on the high side. Right. Right. But that's on basis of what it is.

32:05Yes. But in terms of what I think there is a tremendous amount of potential, it will be very difficult to achieve, but I think possible. And I think ultimately it could be one of the most valuable companies in the world. So, when we think about this, in order for that to happen, in order for that, so I think

32:28I met you and took me a few years, and then I believe in you and your heart, right, no heart. And so. I think you were a skeptical, and at our first meeting you were a bit skeptical. Ha ha ha ha. Ha ha ha ha. And so, the way I think about it is that, so what I'm trusting you with the future of our country, the world actually, when you're in charge of a media, like that.

32:50And so what I think about is, so how do you prevent to be in Jewish? How do you prevent this anti-Semitism or if I were black? How do you prevent all of the, the how do you prevent the use of the N word? And when I think about TikTok, and they're able, we're just looking at pictures to tell what you're gonna do, you know, you move your left arm, you move your right arm, what you other pictures you like.

33:20So that's what they do with their software and they grade their algorithm. How can we not have an amazing algorithm? Because we know more about them doing with TikTok And we ought to know what interest people have. And because of that in words, we should be able to figure out words that people are using what that means and considering what they content they're interested in.

33:43We should be able to figure out the software how to moderate this and prevent that from happening. Is that true or not? Yes, absolutely. I totally agree. I want to be clear. But content moderation policies have not changed at Twitter. And it is not OK to engage in hateful conduct on Twitter.

34:06So we have had actually, oddly, targeted attacks, where temporarily people have been able to put some hate speech on Twitter. But it has been taken down immediately. So now, part of what I'm trying to achieve with this sort of enabling everyone to be payment verified with Twitter Blue is to try to get as many people payment

34:40verified as possible. It's only eight bucks a month. Although for some people that were complaining about that, and these are people who pay more with the net for their latte. I'm going to be one of your Twitter friends. Thank you. Thank you. But it's part of its revenue, part of it is payment authentication.

34:59And so if somebody, because there is a huge problem with spam and bots and trolls on Twitter and organizations trying to manipulate a public opinion and just generally making the system worse. And I think that there is an answer to that, which is to get as many Regular users of Twitter to be a subscriber for eight dollars a month

35:27You'll get a lot more than just a blue check mark for eight dollars a month because now we can afford long-form video along for long audio podcasts And we can also start sharing revenue with content creators, which is essential Keep them a chance to make money. Yeah, absolutely Just so I mean right now you see on Twitter you'll see a lot of links posted to YouTube and TikTok

35:50And that's because at least until now Twitter is not even given them enough video length to post their video And then they give the content creators no means of monetizing the video So we're gonna change that rapidly at Twitter. It's gonna be transformative But if we can get enough verified users and we're gonna prioritize

36:11Twitter search replies mentions by verified users first and And, yeah, that's what we're getting. That's what we're called, amplified? Yeah, so if you're payment verified with Boot Checkmark, then you'll pre-priotize. And so the point of this is to make crime not to pay because right now to create a bot on Twitter costs less than a penny.

36:43So the cost of crime is so cheap, And that's part of why crime and hateful conduct pays. But if somebody risks losing even $8, it's too expensive to now have 100,000 fake accounts. Because they have to spend $800,000 a month, as opposed to $800 a month. And then we also, since we're using payment authentication, we're piggybacking on the authentication system of the payment system.

37:16And we're also paying you back in the scope of Apple's authentication system, which is another layer of security. So the net effect will be over time that the verified users will pretty much always be at the top of comments and search. And you won't really see, you'll have to scroll far to see the unverified users, which will be the bots and trolls and whatnot.

37:41And this is sort of analogous to Google Search. If you go to page 8 of Google Search, there will be a ton of scams and stuff, call it page 8, page 9, something like that. And the thing is that Google Search results are so good for page 1 that you never go to page 8. So it's rare.

38:08And the old joke is like. of something we don't want to see it gets pushed way down. Yeah, just basically the bad stuff gets pushed way down. And then crime stops paying, and then they stop trying to do all these things. And we can recruit them as engineers to program for us crime guys.

38:24Yeah. So I mean, the joke is like, what's the best place to hide a dead body would be the second page of Google search results? Nobody ever goes there. So today we fired half of Twitter, and that should save us, what, four billion a year? No, I was not gonna say four billion a year, I wish.

38:53So, I mean, to be frank, Twitter was having pretty serious revenue challenges and cost challenges before the acquisition talks started. And any company that is dependent on advertising has had a hard time. So if you look at say, Snap or Google, Facebook, whatnot, they've all had a difficult time with advertising revenue dropping.

39:21And Twitter is more currently more vulnerable than they are to advertising because most of Twitter's advertising is large brand advertising, as opposed to direct response. So it's kind of like a much more discretionary ad spend than it is for, like if you can do direct response for a specific product.

39:48And then we also recently had a lot of difficulty with activist groups pressuring major advertisers to stop spending money on Twitter. This is despite us doing everything possible to appease them and to make it clear that moderation rules and hateful conduct rules have not changed and we're continuing to enforce them. A number of major advertisers

40:15have stopped spending on Twitter. But this doesn't seem right because we've made no change in our operations at all. But nonetheless, the activist groups have been successful in causing a massive drop in Twitter advertising revenue. And we've done our absolute best to appease them, and nothing is working.

40:39So this is a major concern, and I think this is frankly an attack on the First Amendment. Like if activist groups can pressure advertisers upon which Twitter is fundamentally dependent to suppress free speech, then that doesn't seem right.

41:07I meant by the way 400 million instead of four billion. I meant actually 400 million instead of four billion. Oh yeah. Okay, so we're now there. We're living at this place. You go there for the next couple, three weeks, you're gonna devote, and then we have a team lined up. You think you have a team lined up to manage it, and then you would just do it the same way we do with SpaceX and Tesla, where you just attend the meetings regularly, say this is what we need to do, do it.

41:42Well, this is what we need. Yeah, my workload went up from about, I don't know, 70 to 8 hours a week to probably 120. So yeah, I go to sleep, I wake up, I work, I go to sleep, wake up, work, do that seven days a week. I'll have to do that for a while. It's no choice. But I think once Twitter is set on the right path, I think it is a much easier thing to manage than SpaceX or Tesla.

42:16So, and I really understand the internet and how to make ROT software personally for 20 years. You know, it's one of the key people behind x.com which became PayPal. And so I also like I'm aware of like a I know how to make a way better PayPal Yeah, yeah pretty much I mean with a lot of other people but there's

42:55There's a product plan I wrote which I wish I'd kept a copy of in July of 2000 where I thought it would be possible to make the most valuable financial institution in the world and we're going to execute that plan from 22 years ago, which amazingly no one has done. And so I think that's part of why I think total will be ultimately extremely valuable

43:21because I'm going to execute the x.com game plan from 22 years ago. some improvements. And we're also going to obviously make Twitter just a way about our system. I mean, it's a sense of reason that, you know, if the social media company is not taking steps to make it positive to be on that social platform,

43:56then people won't come or they'll leave, you know. So you speak of sort of anti-Semitism or racism or anything like that. Well, I mean, who's gonna stay on a platform if that's prevalent? Like that's, that's, yeah. I mean, come on. Part of it's inherent wrongness. Who's gonna stay on the platform?

44:16So you wanna be, it needs to be something where, like our goal with Twitter is like, how do we get 80% of America? Maybe not the far left and the far right, but maybe we don't want them necessarily. But how do we get 80% of the public to join a digital town square and voice their opinion and exchange ideas and maybe once in a while change their minds?

44:44An occasion. Yeah, I mean, once in a while. So Red also that you said, and then we'll move off the Twitter, But you said that your goal is you want to make the 20% of people who are on the far right hate you, just like you want to make the 20% of people on the far left hate you.

45:03So... Well, I don't want them to hate me. But I think the extremists, it's very difficult to satisfy extremists. So, unless you fully buy into whatever their dog may is. But I'm confident we can satisfy, I don't know, 80% of America, 80% of the world, but maybe not the most, the 10% most extreme of either side.

45:31And I would count that as a great outcome. And I think it is important to have a sort of a digital town square where people feel comfortable talking. And I also think it's like one of the things that's important is to be able to sort of decide what kind of experience you want to have on Twitter.

45:50Because some people might say, OK, like, this was a radio station. I want the easy listening smooth jazz station. OK, cool. So you feel to have that setting for Twitter. And then some people might say, no, I want heavy metal thrash. And like, OK, so now this is going to be sort of, then you don't mind someone saying mean things to you within the context of the law, and you don't mind engaging in vigorous arguments on Twitter

46:20and that kind of thing. But you should be able to kind of like pick your preference and decide if you want sort of full contact battle or do you want like no, I just want to look at poppies and flowers and nice landscapes and stuff. So let's go off Twitter. two other topics, 40 has some questions.

46:43The number one is logistics. When we're starting to make so many cars by the end of this year, 40,000 cars a week. I mean, I have to be careful of MMPI, but I believe I have said in the past publicly that our aspiration is to reach 40,000 a week by the end of this year. So if we're doing that, then that means that we're producing a car over 15 seconds.

47:09Yeah. And so, but that's still only two million cars a year. There's a hundred million cars that are made a year. And so the question, so presumably capacity to be able to logistics to ship all these cars all over the place to have people pick them up where they want them. But not if they all do them in the same week.

47:33Yes, totally. So, I mean, we're a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of A bit of criticism from our Q3 results because we had a lot of cars in transit. And the reason was that we got too big for our cars to actually be transported in the final few weeks. There's weren't enough car carriers and weren't enough ships.

47:55But it's actually good in the long run to smooth out deliveries and actually have cars and transit at the end of the quarter, because then you're not rushing to get everything delivered by the end of the quarter and paying all these expedite fees. So my question always is, we have autonomous driving and we have autonomous trucks.

48:18Is that one of the ideas that we're going to be able to move things around with our own with the sound of drivers that we're going to have autonomous transport? Yes. That's question one. We can also, yeah, I mean, if you're in the area, have the car just drive to you. And then the other one was about materials.

48:38And when all of a sudden, so we have somehow navigated supply chain problems from other people. And you might have thought that it was the absolute brilliance that we had to be able to do that. But probably the reason is that when you start off and you don't make any cars a year and

48:56you go to someone and say we're going to make 20 million cars a year from zero, who's going to believe you and make all the equipment that we need. So as a result of that, you were forced initially to be able to say, OK, we're going to get, we'll vertically integrate. We can't rely on you.

49:12We'll do vertically integration. And cut it. Materials. I can talk longer if you'd like. Don't shoot the messenger. Talk a little bit longer. Materials. So we have geology. Anyone wants to show us in mind, we We've got people in minds who are knowledgeable and they come to us and say we can produce

49:35this much lithium, this much copper, this much. We are able to assess that and give contracts to be able to say contractual agreements. Okay, and they'll rely on our agreement, other people they won't. Is that fair and Glencore the enough? Well, the scaling constraints change as time goes by.

49:56And in the beginning, we were very vertically integrated because suppliers didn't take us seriously. Like we could get hardly any of the A, of the best suppliers wouldn't talk to us because the car startup has not been successful in the United States since Chrysler in the 30s, I believe they started.

50:16So it's been a century since the car company was successful in the US. That was not a foreign car company coming in with that was already successful in their home market. But for an American car startup, it was the first, it tells us for success in 100 years. So you can imagine if you're an auto supplier, that doesn't sound like a smart financial decision.

50:33Exactly. So then we had to just build a lot of the stuff ourselves. Be vodically integrated or we couldn't create the car. And then that ended up being an asset because now we understood so much about the entire supply chain and what it took to build a car. So we were able to design a more integrated vehicle

50:58that actually needed far fewer parts and costs less and weighs less and has higher performance. But it is looking increasingly like for some of the critical elements of batteries that Tesla will need to get into the mining business, mining and refining. That's why Glencore was announced.

51:20That's where we're talking to Glencore, we were. No, and we've never contemplated investing in Glencore. I'm talking about Tesla doing it. Ourselves. Yes. Trans No Q&A. Who's there? The power's about to hear. I'll do it anyway. I mean, is it from me or you? I don't know. Questions?

51:54So by the way, if you leave before we give away the door prizes, which are two Teslas, you're not eligible to get the Teslas. But go ahead. I gave an extra one once, I guess it last time. But we're not going to do that again. I got to be in your seat in order to get the Tesla's.

52:16I'm paying for it, not Elon. Questions? Elon, Santa once said, every genius has a touch of madness. I thought you'd like that quote. I agree with the madness part. So even with Tesla's a publicly traded company, I think it's down 40% or something from its high, is selling at 70 times earnings.

52:50Meanwhile, Mercedes-Benz, which now produces EVs, is selling for six times earnings and yielding 5%. Why should I invest in Tesla rather than Mercedes-Benz? Well, I actually rarely try to convince anyone to invest in Tesla. And many times I've recommended people don't invest in Tesla and I've set off stock is too high

53:22But then people just ignore me and keep buying the stock some reason so But if I think at At a very high level I'd say that autonomy is an insanely fundamental breakthrough And and no one is even close to Tesla for solving generalized autonomy, generalized self-driving vehicles.

53:47No one's even close. And with self-driving, as I was talking about earlier, the car becomes, call it roughly five times more useful, but it costs the same to build. Now can you imagine what would happen if a company was doing, we're doing like a 25 to 30% gross margins, But suddenly that same thing was five times more valuable.

54:16What would that do to the value of Tesla and the value of that car? It boggles the mind, actually. So if you think of net present value of future cash flows, if you actually do the math on that, it's insane. Then there's also the Optimus program, which is our humanoid robot, which we will leverage manufacturing

54:44expertise and the intelligence we've developed for self-driving to have a useful humanoid robot. Now, the economy is fundamentally GDP per capita times capita. If you no longer have a constraint on capita because of a useful humanoid robot, it is not clear that there is any limit to the size of the economy.

55:15And these things will actually happen. So that's probably a good reason. Yeah. Yeah. One more question. Okay. This is the last question. You have given all the cars that you're going to make.

55:51And I hope Ron's right, whether it's 10 million or 20 million. You're going to need a lot of charging stations around the world. Have you thought about doing it more efficiently and more economically and better for our ecosystem

56:15from an ESG perspective? Because you may or may not know, there are 400 million existing streetlights in the world. And every street light has pervasive, persistent electricity. You could take some amount of those street lights which are half owned by utilities and half owned by cities and repurpose that.

56:42And that would probably be the most cost efficient way to roll out millions of charging stations all over the world. Well, thanks. I think they actually are using that idea in London and some other cities. But if, I mean, I think the long-term goal for our supercharger stations is that they

57:03will have solar, like Tesla solar and batteries at them so that they are as many as possible are self-sustaining, that the supercharger stations generate the energy during the day and then also have a localized battery pack to so that people can charge at night. So that the Tesla Supercharging stations would continue to function even in a zombie apocalypse.

57:27So just never know, that's coming one day, we know it. It's just a matter of time. Thank you very much. Thank you to Selfie with you. That's Selfie, a post that on Twitter.

57:53Your arms are longer than mine. Also, please use Twitter. And please subscribe to Twitter Verified eight bucks. And actually it's technically at 7.99, so slightly less. But I really encourage everyone here to use Twitter. And yeah, please do that. Here we go. How do we do this? I guess this row.

58:30Okay. All right. Thank you, everyone. Thank you very much, Ian. I appreciate it. Are you staying around for dinner? That's a good idea for the position. I really appreciate it. Are you staying around for dinner? At that set, video deposition.

从现场发言里挑出的 9 句原话,附中文译文(AI 翻译,以英文原话为准)。点时间戳可跳到视频对应位置。

然后对SpaceX来说,我认为让未来令人兴奋、并让人类的存在得到长期保障很重要。我认为我们必须成为多行星物种

And then for SpaceX, I think it's important for the future to be exciting and for humanities existence to be insured over the long term. I think we must become a multi-planet species

▶ 1:46

所以我认为,我们必须采取行动,确保意识之光延续下去。因为我们应该把意识真正看作广袤黑暗中的一支小蜡烛。它很容易熄灭。

So I think it's important we take the actions to ensure that the light of consciousness continues. Because we should really view consciousness as a small candle in a vast darkness. It could easily go out.

▶ 3:00

所以如果实现自动驾驶,汽车大概能开50到60个小时。这样汽车的效用会提高五倍,你知道,这就是自动驾驶。这是一件非常非常大的事。

So if there were autonomous, you could probably drive, the cars could drive for 50 or 60 hours. So you would see a five-fold increase in the utility of the car, you know, that could be autonomy. This is a really, really gigantic thing.

▶ 6:56

而且,需求必须由能够解释这个需求的人提出,而不是由一个部门提出,因为那样你不知道该找谁谈。

And the requirements must be given from a person who can explain the requirement, not from a department, because then you don't know who to talk to.

▶ 9:50

我的一位好朋友说,创办公司就像吞玻璃、凝视深渊。所以人们会问我,你能做什么来鼓励创业者创办公司?我说,如果你需要鼓励,就别创办公司。

And one of my good friends of mine is saying like starting a company is like eating glass and staring into the abyss. So my people will tell me, what can you do to encourage entrepreneurs to start companies? I'm like, if you need encouragement, don't start a company.

▶ 16:53

有了Starship,我们要做到100%可重复使用。我无法说清这会带来多么深远的变化,但一枚完全且快速可重复使用的轨道火箭,有可能把进入太空的成本降低一千倍。

With Starship, we're going for 100% reusable. I cannot, it's able to say how profound a change this will be, but a fully and rapidly reusable orbital rocket has the potential to drop the cost of access to space by a factor of a thousand.

▶ 20:18

所以在已知物理规律下,制造一枚完全可重复使用的轨道火箭只是勉强可能,仅仅是勉强可能。这就像一款电子游戏,难度设定是极端困难。

So with known physics, it is only barely possible to make a fully reusable orbital rocket, only barely possible. This was a video game, the setting is extreme difficulty.

▶ 21:27

生活不能只是解决一个又一个问题。需要有理由让人受到鼓舞,有理由打动你的心,让你说:是的,未来会很棒。

Life can't just be about solving one problem or another. There needs to be reasons to be inspired. Reasons to move your heart and say yes, the future is going to be great.

▶ 29:31

我会说,自动驾驶是一个极其根本性的突破,而且在解决通用自动驾驶、通用无人驾驶汽车方面,没有谁接近Tesla。

I'd say that autonomy is an insanely fundamental breakthrough And and no one is even close to Tesla for solving generalized autonomy, generalized self-driving vehicles.

▶ 53:12

资源与出处